发表机构
Brown University; Carnegie Mellon University; University of California, Berkeley; Artificiality Institute（布朗大学; 卡内基梅隆大学; 加州大学伯克利分校; 人工性研究所）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本研究通过定性调查发现，AI辅助任务中人们的所有权感取决于协作过程，主导、迭代或重写时保留所有权，仅批准建议时则放弃，并提出了促进作者感的AI研究方向。
AI 中文摘要
当与AI共同完成的工作仍然感觉像是我们自己的吗？随着AI融入日常任务，我们必须审视当机器参与生产我们所创造的东西时，我们的所有权和贡献感会发生什么变化。我们报告了一项探索性定性调查，参与者被要求描述最近完成的两项自选AI辅助任务：一项感觉像是自己的，另一项则不然。我们发现，感受到的所有权取决于协作过程：当人们仅仅批准AI的建议时，他们会放弃所有权，但当他们主导、迭代或重写时，他们会保留所有权。所有权还可以扩展到人们拥有项目愿景但不拥有执行力的场景；受访者报告称，对于没有AI就无法完成的任务，他们拥有高所有权。个人声音的丧失和对输出的理解不足都会削弱所有权。最后，披露AI使用的意愿通常与实际的自豪感或所有权脱钩，而是受社区规范和害怕功劳被抹去的恐惧所影响。基于这些发现，我们提出了几个研究方向，以促进AI的发展，支持人们对自身生活的作者感。
英文摘要
When does work done with AI still feel like ours? As AI becomes woven into everyday tasks, we must examine what happens to our sense of ownership and contribution when a machine shares in producing what we make. We report an exploratory qualitative survey in which participants were asked to describe two recent, self-selected tasks completed with AI: one that felt like their own and one that did not. We find that felt ownership depends on the process of collaboration: people disown work when they merely approve AI's suggestions, but retain ownership when they lead, iterate, or rewrite. Ownership can also extend to settings where people own the vision for a project but not the execution; respondents reported high ownership on tasks they could not have completed without AI. Loss of personal voice and a lack of comprehension of the output both erode ownership. Finally, willingness to disclose AI use is often decoupled from actual pride or ownership, and instead shaped by community norms and fear of credit erasure. We propose several research directions as a result of these findings to promote AI development that supports people's sense of authorship over their own lives.
