评估开源智慧城市平台健康状况
Evaluating the Health of Open-Source Smart City Platforms
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文基于“开源健康”概念，从生态系统、文档、代码安全等维度评估开源智慧城市平台，为预算有限的城市提供采用决策参考。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
为管理智慧城市的复杂性，业界已提出多种智慧城市平台（SCP），包括专有和开源两类。这些平台通常作为下层物联网设备与上层智慧服务之间的中间件，通过具体化不同城市共同的各种需求，简化了智慧城市的管理。开源软件（OSS）通常免费，使开源SCP成为预算较小但仍希望提升居民和访客生活质量与效率的城市的有吸引力的选择。此外，使用开源SCP可促进数字主权，因为城市能控制数据存储位置，且不易受供应商锁定影响。缺乏对OSS的支持阻碍了城市IT团队（往往技术资源稀缺）对其采用。一个活跃（即“健康”）的生态系统，包括协调良好的开发者和用户、安装和用户手册的可用性、无漏洞且有文档的代码、测试套件及其他工件，是采用开源SCP前的重要决策因素。本文利用“OSS健康”概念评估不同开源SCP，涵盖上述多项特征。
英文摘要
To manage the complexity of smart cities, a variety of smart city platforms (SCPs), both proprietary and open-source, have been proposed. Typically acting as middleware between IoT devices at a lower layer and smart services at a higher layer, these platforms simplify the management of smart cities by reifying a variety of requirements common to different municipalities. Open-source software (OSS) is typically free of charge, making open-source SCPs an attractive option for municipalities with smaller budgets that still wish to improve efficiency and quality of life for residents and visitors. Furthermore, using an OSS SCP promotes digital sovereignty, since municipalities can control where the data will reside and will be less prone to vendor lock-in. A lack of support for OSS hinders its adoption by municipalities' IT teams, often with scarce technical resources. An active (aka "healthy") ecosystem, including well-orchestrated developers and users, the availability of installation and user manuals, non-vulnerable and documented code, test batteries, and other artifacts, is an important decision factor before adopting an OSS SCP. In this paper, we evaluate different open-source SCPs using the concept of "OSS health", covering several of the aforementioned characteristics.
发表机构
- Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL)（里斯本大学学院）
- NOVA LINCS, DI, FCT/UNL（新林克斯，计算与信息科学系，法科学与技术学院/新里斯本大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
