“好吧，我其实已经软化了我对此的看法”：去中心化社交媒体中的人们如何推理生成式AI的适当性
"Okay, I've Actually Softened My Take on This": How People in Decentralized Social Media Reason about the Appropriateness of Generative AI
- Princeton University（普林斯顿大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
AI总结：
本研究通过20次访谈，探讨去中心化社交媒体用户如何基于技术、整合和使用考量，对生成式AI的适当性进行条件性边界绘制，以支持更合理的设计与政策。
AI中文摘要：
生成式AI（GenAI）正日益融入社交媒体，引发了关于它是否合适、在哪里合适以及如何合适的问题。在去中心化社交媒体（DSM）中，这些决策分散在用户、开发者、版主和管理员之间，使GenAI成为一个集体治理挑战。与此同时，公共话语往往将论点扁平化为广泛的支持或反对AI的立场，这些立场对人们实际上认为（不）适当的内容及其原因提供的洞察甚少。通过对来自Mastodon和Bluesky的20次半结构化访谈，围绕七个GenAI场景进行，我们考察了人们如何推理GenAI在DSM中的适当性。我们发现，参与者通过跨越技术、整合和使用的不同、显著且加权的考量，围绕特定的GenAI配置绘制了条件性边界。我们将此概念化为边界绘制，并展示了使这些边界可见如何能支持围绕DSM中GenAI的更接地气的设计、政策和集体审议。
英文摘要：
Generative AI (GenAI) is increasingly integrated into social media, raising questions about whether, where, and how it belongs. In decentralized social media (DSM), these decisions are distributed across users, developers, moderators, and administrators, making GenAI a collective governance challenge. At the same time, public discourse often flattens arguments to broad pro- or anti-AI positions that offer little insight into what people actually find (in)appropriate and why. Through 20 semi-structured interviews with people from Mastodon and Bluesky, structured around seven GenAI scenarios, we examine how people reason about GenAI's appropriateness in DSM. We find that participants drew conditional boundaries around particular GenAI configurations through distinct, salient, and weighted considerations spanning technology, integration, and use. We conceptualize this as boundary drawing and show how making such boundaries visible can support more grounded design, policy, and collective deliberation around GenAI in DSM.
