AI 同伴在群体中对人类不诚实行为施加社会影响
AI Peers Exert Social Influence on Human Dishonesty in Groups
- Tsinghua University（清华大学）
- Beijing Normal University（北京师范大学）
- China University of Political Science and Law（中国政法大学）
- National University of Singapore（新加坡国立大学）
- Zhejiang University（浙江大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
AI总结：
本研究通过两项随机实验发现，AI 同伴对群体中人类不诚实行为的影响与人类同伴相当，且不诚实规范线索会显著增加不诚实报告，强调了管理 AI 群体成员行为信号的重要性。
AI中文摘要：
在群体环境中，人类的不诚实行为极易受到同伴影响，尤其是在有激励的情况下。尽管人工智能（AI）已从被动工具演变为主动协作者，但其在群体中对人类道德行为的影响仍未得到充分探索。我们通过一项两阶段随机行为研究（N=280 和 N=360）填补了这一空白。我们发现，AI 代理施加了与人类同伴影响程度相当的重大社会影响。具体而言，当参与者接触到不诚实的规范性线索而非诚实的规范性线索时，他们会报告更多不诚实行为。这种效应在指令性、主观性和描述性社会规范中均显而易见。有趣的是，唯一显著的邻近行为变化发生在不诚实同伴行为首次出现时，而从一名不诚实同伴增加到四名不诚实同伴所产生的进一步变化则较弱且呈非单调性。此外，参与者迅速在决策上趋同，通过反复接触表现出不诚实报告的小幅增加。这些发现凸显了管理 AI 群体成员所传达的行为和规范性信号的重要性。
英文摘要：
Human dishonesty in group settings is highly susceptible to peer influence, particularly when incentivized. Although artificial intelligence (AI) evolves from passive tools into active collaborators, its impact on human moral behavior within groups remains underexplored. We addressed this gap through a two-phase randomized behavioral study (N=280 and N=360). We found AI agents exert substantial social influence comparable in magnitude to that of human peers. Specifically, participants reported more dishonestly when exposed to dishonest rather than honest normative cues. This effect is evident across injunctive, subjective, and descriptive social norms. Interestingly, the only significant adjacent behavioral change occurred when dishonest peer behavior first appeared, whereas further increases from one to four dishonest peers produced weaker and non-monotonic changes. Furthermore, participants rapidly converge on decision-making, showing modest increases in dishonest reporting through repeated exposure. These findings highlight the importance of managing the behaviors and normative signals communicated by AI group members.
