arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2609.16775cs.CV

IMVS:具有测试时自适应的交互式医学体积分割——一种用于放射学数据集标注的新方法

IMVS: Interactive Medical Volume Segmentation with Test-Time Adaptation - A New Method for Annotating Radiology Datasets

Abhilaksh Singh Reen, Kushal Borkar, Ritvik Mahapatra

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

针对放射学数据标注中交互效率低的问题,提出IMVS框架,结合在线微调的2D切片适配器、冻结的3D掩膜跟踪器及软教师-学生对齐,在8个公开数据集上显著减少标注工作量,尤其擅长挑战性目标。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

标注大型放射学数据集受到在3D体积中逐切片勾画结构所需手动工作的瓶颈限制。交互式方法减少了这一工作量,但交互效率仍然不高:逐切片方法(包括许多基础模型)忽略了切片间的连续性,而3D和基于视频的方法使用一个固定的传播器来传播提示,该传播器从不适应目标体积,因此在低对比度或病理结构上会漂移,必须重新提示。我们提出了IMVS,一个人在环路中的标注框架,它将三个组件组合成一个闭环,而不是一个新的分割原语:一个轻量级的2D切片掩膜适配器(SMA),从用户涂鸦在线微调;一个冻结的体积掩膜跟踪器(VMT),在相邻切片间传播校正后的掩膜;以及一个软教师-学生对齐,以限制遗忘。SMA与骨干网络无关(UNet++、DeepLabV3、TransUNet)。在8个公开的CT/MRI数据集上,IMVS在质量上与强大的交互式基线相当,同时大幅削减了标注工作量:比熟练的基于复制的手动工作流快14.4倍(比朴素手动快22.3倍),比逐切片方法快4.6倍,比3D交互式方法快1.9倍。MedSAM2和ScribblePrompt在轮廓清晰的器官上保持竞争力或更强;IMVS的优势在具有挑战性的目标和交互效率上最大。源代码和演示视频:此https URL。

英文摘要

Annotating large radiology datasets is bottlenecked by the manual effort of delineating structures slice-by-slice in 3D volumes. Interactive methods reduce this effort but stay interaction-inefficient: slice-wise methods (including many foundation models) ignore inter-slice continuity, while 3D and video-based methods propagate a prompt with a \emph{fixed} propagator that never adapts to the target volume, so it drifts on low-contrast or pathological structures and must be re-prompted. We present IMVS, a human-in-the-loop annotation framework that composes three components into a closed loop rather than a new segmentation primitive: a lightweight 2D Slice Mask Adapter (SMA) fine-tuned online from user scribbles, a frozen Volume Mask Tracker (VMT) that propagates corrected masks across adjacent slices, and a soft teacher--student alignment that limits forgetting. The SMA is backbone-agnostic (UNet++, DeepLabV3, TransUNet). Across 8 public CT/MRI datasets, IMVS matches strong interactive baselines in quality while sharply cutting annotation effort: $14.4\times$ faster than a proficient copy-based manual workflow ($22.3\times$ over naive manual), $4.6\times$ over slice-wise and $1.9\times$ over 3D interactive methods. MedSAM2 and ScribblePrompt stay competitive or stronger on well-delineated organs; IMVS's advantage is largest on challenging targets and on interaction efficiency. Source code and Demo Video: https://github.com/AbhilakshSinghReen/imvs.

发表机构

  • California State University(加州州立大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

↑