arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2609.16037physics.gen-ph

基于MCMC分析的真实$f(G)$引力框架的观测约束与宇宙增长指数

Observational Constraints and Cosmic Growth Index of Realistic $f(G)$ Gravity Frameworks using MCMC Analysis

Praveen Kumar Dhankar, Munyeshyaka Albert, Mohit Thakre, Joseph Ntahompagaze, Safiqul Islam, Farook Rahaman

首次发表 更新
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

本研究通过MCMC分析约束两种$f(G)$引力模型,发现DESI BAO数据降低$H_0$和$\Omega_{m0}$,模型II的统计指标偏向$\Lambda$CDM,但两种模型均与结构增长观测相容。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

我们对修正的高斯-博内引力,即$f(G)$引力,进行了全面的观测分析,同时研究了背景宇宙膨胀和亚视界线性物质扰动。我们考虑了两种可行的函数形式:反正切参数化(模型I)和广义多项式幂律模型(模型II)。利用马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛(MCMC)集成采样器,我们通过背景和结构增长观测来约束其参数空间。我们的分析采用了宇宙计时器(CC)、Pantheon+ Ia型超新星汇编(PP)、红移空间畸变(RSD)以及暗能量光谱仪器第一年重子声学振荡测量(DESI BAO)的累积组合。DESI BAO数据的加入使得哈勃常数$H_0$和当前物质密度参数$\Omega_{m0}$的优选值出现明显下移。对于模型II,完整分析得到$H_0=64.02^{+4.13}_{-3.08}\\ \mathrm{km\\,s^{-1}\\,Mpc^{-1}}$和$\Omega_{m0}=0.249^{+0.047}_{-0.038}$。我们进一步使用$\Delta\mathrm{AIC}_c$、$\Delta\mathrm{BIC}$和$\Delta\mathrm{DIC}$评估了模型相对于$\Lambda$CDM的统计性能。对于模型II,完整数据集给出$\Delta\mathrm{AIC}_c=4.233$和$\Delta\mathrm{DIC}=5.971$,偏向于$\Lambda$CDM基线。在扰动层面,两种模型都表现出与大规模结构观测相容的稳定增长历史。模型预测了晚期膨胀动力学在$z\approx0.5005$(模型I)和$z\approx0.6086$(模型II)处的转变,突出了它们宇宙学演化的差异。

英文摘要

We present a comprehensive observational analysis of modified Gauss--Bonnet, or $f(G)$, gravity by investigating both the background cosmological expansion and sub-horizon linear matter perturbations. We consider two viable functional forms: an arctangent parameterization (Model~I) and a generalized polynomial power-law model (Model~II). Using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) ensemble sampler, we constrain their parameter spaces through background and structure-growth observations. Our analysis employs cumulative combinations of Cosmic Chronometers (CC), the Pantheon+ Type Ia Supernovae compilation (PP), Redshift-Space Distortions (RSD), and the Year-1 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation measurements from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI BAO). The inclusion of DESI BAO data produces a noticeable downward shift in the preferred values of the Hubble constant, $H_0$, and present matter density parameter, $Ω_{m0}$. For Model~II, the full analysis yields $H_0=64.02^{+4.13}*{-3.08},\mathrm{km,s^{-1},Mpc^{-1}}$ and $Ω*{m0}=0.249^{+0.047}_{-0.038}$. We further assess the statistical performance of the models relative to $Λ$CDM using $Δ\mathrm{AIC}_c$, $Δ\mathrm{BIC}$, and $Δ\mathrm{DIC}$. For Model~II, the full dataset gives $Δ\mathrm{AIC}_c=4.233$ and $Δ\mathrm{DIC}=5.971$, favoring the $Λ$CDM baseline. At the perturbation level, both models exhibit stable growth histories compatible with large-scale structure observations. The models predict transitions in the late-time expansion dynamics at $z\approx0.5005$ and $z\approx0.6086$ for Models~I and II, respectively, highlighting differences in their cosmological evolution.

发表机构

  • Symbiosis Institute of Technology, Nagpur Campus, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India(印度浦那西姆比奥斯国际(认定)大学纳格浦尔校区西姆比奥斯技术学院)
  • Department of Education, East African University Rwanda, Nyagatare, Rwanda(卢旺达尼亚加塔雷东非大学卢旺达教育学院)
  • Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, University of Rwanda,Kigali, Rwanda(卢旺达基加利卢旺达大学科学与技术学院物理系)
  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, College of Science, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Saudi Arabia(沙特阿拉伯艾哈萨费萨尔国王大学理学院数学与统计系)
  • Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India(印度加尔各答贾达普大学数学系)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

补充信息

↑