持续人机认知的动态组织：从构念层面变化到关系结构
The Dynamic Organization of Sustained Human-AI Cognition: From Construct-Level Change to Relational Structure
- Le Mans Université（勒芒大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
AI总结：
本文提出动态认知组织框架，从构念层面转向关系结构，以五维关系和递归原则解释持续AI参与下人类认知的组织差异，并提供可检验命题。
AI中文摘要：
随着生成式人工智能成为写作、学习、信息检索、分析、决策和问题解决中的常规参与者，人机认知研究不仅需要解决AI是否改变心理构念、使用强度或任务绩效的问题，还需要解决在相似的总量指标之下人类认知活动是如何组织的问题。本文提出了一个动态认知组织框架，将分析从构念层面的变化转向以个体在持续AI参与下的当前任务认知状态为锚点的关系组织。该框架区分了五个关系维度：执行位点、认知治理、表征重组、过程组织和可达认知空间；它还提出了一个路径特定的递归原则，即交互结果、成本和体验可能选择性地重新加权不同组织路径的未来概率。随后提出了五组可检验的命题：相同的总体AI使用强度可以对应不同的认知组织；相似的即时结果可能源于不同的组织，这些组织对近端后续结果具有不同的预测价值；纵向组织变化不必与总体AI使用强度同步；可达认知空间的扩展与先前存在或新兴的人类起源路径的置换可能在一个片段内共存；反复出现的认知组织可能重新分配认知实践机会，累积的差异可能对应于策略、习惯和能力的不同发展轨迹。其贡献在于提供了一个分析层次和五维关系结构，用于描述、比较、测量和测试总量指标或构念层面分析无法唯一确定的过程差异。
英文摘要：
As generative artificial intelligence becomes a routine participant in writing, learning, information retrieval, analysis, decision making, and problem solving, human-AI cognition research must address not only whether AI changes psychological constructs, use intensity, or task performance, but also how human cognitive activity is organized beneath similar aggregate indicators. This article proposes a dynamic cognitive organization framework that shifts analysis from construct-level change to relational organization anchored in the person's current task-cognitive state under sustained AI participation. The framework distinguishes five relational dimensions: execution locus, cognitive governance, representational reorganization, process organization, and reachable cognitive space; it also proposes a path-specific recursive principle whereby interaction outcomes, costs, and experiences may selectively reweight future probabilities of different organizational pathways. Five sets of testable propositions follow: the same overall AI-use intensity can correspond to different cognitive organizations; similar immediate outcomes can arise from different organizations with different predictive value for proximal subsequent outcomes; longitudinal organizational change need not track overall AI-use intensity; expansion of reachable cognitive space and displacement of pre-existing or emerging human-originated pathways may coexist within one episode; and recurrent cognitive organizations may redistribute cognitive practice opportunities, with accumulated differences potentially corresponding to different developmental trajectories in strategies, habits, and abilities. The contribution is an analytic level and five-dimensional relational structure for describing, comparing, measuring, and testing process differences that aggregate indicators or construct-level analyses do not uniquely determine.
