从基准测试到部署:面向工业纺织录入的移位鲁棒织物识别
From Benchmark to Deployment: Shift-Robust Fabric Recognition for Industrial Textile Onboarding
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
针对织物识别从基准到部署的失效问题,本文通过消除数据泄漏、提出中心纹理方法提升13.5%准确率并优化成本感知路由策略,实现可部署的工业纺织录入。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
自动识别织物的组织结构(平纹、斜纹、缎纹)是纺织采购中的一个瓶颈,因为新到的样品仍需人工分类。基准测试的准确率表明该问题已解决,但实际部署中却难以奏效。在包含\ umClasses{}个类别的FabricFlow基准上,我们揭示了三个被总体准确率掩盖的差距。首先,重复性审计发现训练/测试数据泄漏会虚增准确率;我们重建了无泄漏的数据划分,以反映真实难度。其次,在干净数据上,导致识别失败的主要原因是目录间的采集源偏移,而非人们可能担心的边缘捷径:在仅含档案的留出集上,标准训练的Top-1准确率为58.0%,校准误差为0.158,而一种简单、与架构无关的中心纹理方法额外提升了13.5个Top-1百分点,并恢复了校准。第三,由于混淆不同织物家族的代价高于家族内的误判,我们优化了一个分类学严重性成本:一种置信度门控的路由策略自动分类高置信度样品,仅将不确定的少数样品转交人工处理,从而大幅降低录入成本。在整个过程中,我们报告了诚实的负面结果:层次分类、OCR融合和零样本视觉-语言模型均未能提供帮助,最终形成了一套具体、校准且成本感知的可部署纺织录入方案。
英文摘要
Automatically recognising a fabric's construction (jersey, twill, satin) is a bottleneck in textile sourcing, where incoming swatches are still typed by hand. Benchmark accuracy suggests the problem is solved, yet rarely survives deployment. On the \numClasses{}-class FabricFlow benchmark we expose three gaps that headline accuracy hides. First, a duplication audit reveals train/test leakage that inflates accuracy; we rebuild leakage-free splits that report the true difficulty. Second, on the clean data the binding failure is acquisition-source shift between catalogues, not the peripheral shortcuts one might fear: on an archive-exclusive hold-out, standard training holds 58.0\% Top-1 at a calibration error of 0.158, while a simple, architecture-agnostic central-texture recipe adds 13.5 Top-1 points and restores calibration. Third, because confusing one fabric family for another is costlier than a within-family slip, we optimise a taxonomic-severity cost: a confidence-gated routing policy auto-types confident swatches and refers only the uncertain minority to a human, sharply cutting onboarding cost. Throughout we report honest negatives: hierarchical classification, OCR fusion and zero-shot vision--language models all fail to help, yielding a concrete, calibrated, cost-aware recipe for deployable textile onboarding.
发表机构
- Laboratory for Artificial Intelligence in Design(设计人工智能实验室)
- School of Design, Royal College of Art(皇家艺术学院设计学院)
- Dept. of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University(香港理工大学工业及系统工程学系)
机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。