发表机构
University of Magdeburg; University of Bergen（马格德堡大学; 卑尔根大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本研究通过皮肤电活动、眼动追踪和问卷的混合方法，比较个体人物与人群层面框架的医学数据故事，发现人物插图与生理唤醒峰值相关，且不同框架引发不同情感品质，推进了叙事医学可视化的时间分辨评估。
AI 中文摘要
叙事可视化将数据嵌入视觉故事中，使医学信息对非专业人士更具亲和力。尽管健康传播中越来越多地使用人物元素，但关于个体人物是否支持情感反应的证据仍不明确。独立于口头自我报告的生理证据尤其稀缺，尽管此类测量应补充参与者的自我报告体验。我们提出了一项混合方法研究，使用皮肤电活动（EDA）、眼动追踪和问卷来比较两种医学数据故事：一种是个体化的、基于人物的版本，另一种是没有个体主角的、一般化的、人群层面的版本。我们考察这种框架如何影响生理唤醒、视觉注意、观看行为和自我报告的情感反应。故事层面的EDA比较仅为基于人物的故事中更强的唤醒提供了有限的支持。更强的证据来自基于眼动追踪的峰值分类，其中人物插图与EDA峰值稳健相关，以及问卷反应显示个体故事引发了更多与共情相关的负面情绪。一般故事引发了更多的敬畏和喜悦，表明个体和人群层面的框架可能支持不同的情感品质。我们还观察到一个初步的故事顺序效应：首先观看个体故事的参与者表现出更高的基于峰值的生理唤醒，尽管这一效应无法完全与疲劳、新奇或学习效应区分开来。通过结合生理、基于注视的、问卷和轻量级定性证据，我们的工作推进了叙事医学可视化的时间分辨评估，并强调需要将唤醒、注意、好奇和自我报告的情绪一起解读。
英文摘要
Narrative visualization embeds data in visual stories to make medical information more relatable for non-experts. Despite the growing use of character elements in health communication, evidence on whether individual characters support affective responses remains inconclusive. Physiological evidence independent of verbal self-report is especially scarce, although such measures should complement participants' self-reported experiences. We present a mixed-methods study using electrodermal activity (EDA), eye tracking, and questionnaires to compare two medical data stories: an individual, character-based version and a general, population-level version without an individual protagonist. We examine how this framing influences physiological arousal, visual attention, viewing behavior, and self-reported affective response. Story-level EDA comparisons provide only limited support for stronger arousal in the character-based story. Stronger evidence comes from eye-tracking-based peak classification, where character illustrations were robustly associated with EDA peaks, and from questionnaire responses showing more negative empathy-related emotions for the individual story. The general story elicited more awe and joy, suggesting that individual and population-level framings may support different emotional qualities. We also observed a preliminary story-order effect: participants who first saw the individual story showed higher peak-based physiological arousal, although this effect cannot be fully disentangled from fatigue, novelty, or learning effects. By combining physiological, gaze-based, questionnaire, and lightweight qualitative evidence, our work advances time-resolved assessment of narrative medical visualization and highlights the need to interpret arousal, attention, curiosity, and self-reported emotions together.
