arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2609.09533cs.CY

心理健康领域AI的可扩展监督:来自治疗间歇期35万次AI辅导对话的经验

Scalable Oversight for AI in Mental Health: Lessons from 350,000 AI Coaching Conversations between Therapy Sessions

Matthew A. Scult, John L. Havlik, Kevin Ramotar, Ethan Goh, Manoj Kanagaraj

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

本文基于35万次AI辅导对话经验,提出结合预防性设计、实时监控和临床评估的三层监督框架,以解决心理健康AI大规模部署中的安全挑战。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

在心理健康护理中,临床医生对每一条AI输出进行审查常被提议作为一种安全保障,但警觉研究表明这种方法在大规模下会失效,并可能反而降低安全性。基于我们在治疗间歇期部署AI辅导工具、处理超过35万次对话的经验,我们描述了如何构建一个三层人机协同(human-on-the-loop)监督框架,该框架结合了预防性设计、实时监控和持续的临床医生评估。我们展示了临床审查中的具体发现如何推动迭代改进,并为评估AI系统的心理健康专业人员提供了实用建议。

英文摘要

Clinician review of every AI output is often proposed as a safeguard in mental healthcare, but vigilance research suggests this approach fails at scale and may paradoxically reduce safety. Drawing on our experience deploying an AI coaching tool across 350,000+ conversations between therapy sessions, we describe how we arrived at a three-layer human-on-the-loop oversight framework combining preventive design, real-time monitoring, and continuous clinician evaluation. We show how specific findings from clinical review drove iterative improvements, and offer practical recommendations for mental health professionals evaluating AI systems.

发表机构

  • Grow Therapy
  • Stanford University School of Medicine(斯坦福大学医学院)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

补充信息

↑