arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

轻子phobic $U(1)_B$ 模型中的赝狄拉克非弹性暗物质:用LUX-ZEPLIN高反冲事件对抗对撞机搜索

Pseudo-Dirac Inelastic Dark Matter in the Leptophobic $U(1)_B$ Model: Confronting the LUX-ZEPLIN High-Recoil Event with Collider Searches

Xin-Yu Du, Wenjie Huang, Keping Xie

arXiv 2609.07225首次发表:更新:

发表机构

Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

本文提出轻子phobic U(1)_B模型解释LZ实验的248 keV核反冲事件,通过重子数规范对称性自然产生稳定暗态和非对角相干流,在特定参数点与LHC双喷注限制相容,并预言了可被未来实验检验的媒介子质量范围。

AI 中文摘要

将LUX-ZEPLIN(LZ)报告的248 keV核反冲候选事件解释为吸热跃迁,通常需要两个人为引入的要素:一个稳定的暗态,以及一个纯非对角的相干流。重子数规范对称性同时提供了这两者。对于最小暗电荷 $B(\chi_L)=-3/2$ 和 $B(\chi_R)=-9/2$,产生暗质量的标量场留下一个精确的剩余宇称 $P=(-1)^{6B}$,稳定了最轻态,而相同的马约拉纳质量使矢量流跃迁成为主导,这是同一性而非选择的结果。在 $m_\chi=1$ TeV 和 $\delta=300$ keV 时,模型是超定的:观测到的LZ区间、领头阶遗迹丰度估计和LHC双喷注限制在单个微扰可接受点 $(M_{Z_B},g_B)\simeq(1.44~\mathrm{TeV},0.233)$ 处交汇。该点目前被现有搜索所允许,但恰好位于触发级双喷注边界之下,因此它仍然存活且尚未定论——对已记录在案的Run-3数据($\sqrt s=13.6$ TeV)重新运行该分析,将排除它或发现它。这种解释并不局限于该质量劈裂:在 $\delta=200$ keV 时,同样的构造预测了一个在可比耦合下更重的媒介子,$M_{Z_B}\simeq2.4$-$3.0$ TeV 且 $g_B\simeq0.15$-$0.34$,这一范围将由HL-LHC双喷注计划进行探测。

英文摘要

Interpreting the $248$~keV nuclear-recoil candidate reported by LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) as an endothermic transition needs two ingredients usually put in by hand: a stable dark state, and a coherent current that is purely off diagonal. Gauging baryon number supplies both. For the minimal dark charges $B(χ_L)=-3/2$ and $B(χ_R)=-9/2$, the scalars that generate the dark masses leave an exact residual parity $P=(-1)^{6B}$ stabilizing the lightest state, while the same Majorana masses make the vector current transition dominated as an identity rather than a choice. At $m_χ=1$~TeV and $δ=300$~keV the model is over-determined: the observed LZ interval, a leading-order relic estimate and the LHC dijet limit meet at the single perturbatively acceptable point $(M_{Z_B},g_B)\simeq(1.44~\mathrm{TeV},0.233)$. That point is allowed by currently existing searches but sits just below the trigger-level dijet boundary, so it is alive and not yet decided--and a re-run of that analysis on the Run-3 data at $\sqrt s=13.6$~TeV, already on tape, will exclude it or find it. Nor is the interpretation confined to that splitting: at $δ=200$~keV, the same construction predicts a heavier mediator at comparable coupling, $M_{Z_B}\simeq2.4$-$3.0$~TeV with $g_B\simeq0.15$-$0.34$, a range the HL-LHC dijet program will probe.

Comments10 pages, 4 figures, 1 table

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑