arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2609.01573cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

将近最优SFT-RL标注预算分配从小型大语言模型扩展至大型大语言模型

Scaling Near-Optimal SFT-RL Annotation Budget Allocation from Small to Large LLMs

Jingtan Wang, Arun Verma, Xiaoqiang Lin, Zhengyuan Liu, Nancy F. Chen, Daniela Rus, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

该研究提出近最优区域框架,发现SFT-RL的近最优区域可从小型代理模型迁移至大型LLM,据此提出无需大规模搜索的实用标注预算分配策略,且结果在多任务、多模型及不同RL方法中一致。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

在大语言模型(LLM)的后训练阶段,如何将固定的标注预算分配给监督微调(SFT)和强化学习(RL)仍是一个未解决的问题。现有研究仅描述了宽泛的趋势(例如,在低数据 regime 下SFT占主导),缺乏原则性的分配框架,也未探究最优比例是否能跨模型规模迁移。我们将该问题以近最优性的视角进行建模:不寻求单一最优的SFT-RL比例,而是刻画近最优区域,即处于峰值性能指定容差范围内的分配集合。实证结果表明,即使在较小的容差(2%-10%)下,该区域也较宽,且随模型规模增大而变宽,并能从小型代理模型可靠地迁移至大型目标模型。这产生了一种实用策略:小型代理模型的实验足以识别可迁移的近最优区域,无需进行 exhaustive 大规模搜索。我们的结果在不同任务、模型家族以及基于偏好的离线RL和基于奖励监督的在线RL方法中均保持一致。我们进一步分析了SFT和RL数据之间标注成本的不对称性如何改变近最优区域。

英文摘要

How to divide a fixed annotation budget between supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) during LLM post-training remains an open problem. Existing work characterizes only broad trends (e.g., SFT dominates in low-data regimes), lacks a principled allocation framework, and does not examine whether the optimal ratio transfers across model sizes. We frame this problem in terms of near-optimality: rather than seeking a single optimal SFT-RL ratio, we characterize the near-optimal region, the set of allocations within a specified tolerance of peak performance. Empirically, this region is wide even for small tolerances (2-10%), widens with model scale, and transfers reliably from small proxy models to large target models. This yields a practical strategy: small proxy-model experiments suffice to identify a transferable near-optimal region, eliminating the need for exhaustive large-scale search. Our results hold consistently across tasks, model families, and both preference-based off-policy and reward-supervision on-policy RL methods. We further analyze how the asymmetry in annotation costs between SFT and RL data shifts the near-optimal region.

发表机构

  • National University of Singapore(新加坡国立大学)
  • Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR)(新加坡科技研究局)
  • Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Centre(新加坡-麻省理工研究与技术联盟中心)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

补充信息

↑