arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

即使有丰富的调查数据和全人口登记数据,出生事件也难以预测

Births are difficult to predict even with rich survey and full-population register data

Elizaveta Sivak, Emily M. Cantrell, Thomas Emery, Javier Garcia-Bernardo, Flavio Hafner, Kasia Karpinska, Malte Lüken, Adrienne Mendrik, Joris Mulder, Hanzhang Ren, Varun Satish, Mark Verhagen, Angelica M. Maineri, Paulina Pankowska, Jasmin Abdel Ghany, Bruno Arpino, Giovanni Cassani, Julia Hellstrand, Katya Ivanova, Sanni Kuikka, Ana Macanovic, Charles Rahal, Felix C. Tropf, Roland J. Veen, Nicole Walasek, Daniël van Wijk, Kelsey Q. Wright, Emilio Zagheni, Henry Abbink, Emanuele Aliverti, Matteo Amestoy, Tilbe Atav, Nicola Barban, Sunnee Billingsley, Goan J. Booij, Louis Boucherie, Yael Broos, Li Ya Chang, Jamie C. Chiu, Chiara Ludovica Comolli, Boris Cule, Qixiang Fang, Dennis M. Feehan, Rachel Ganly, Erwin Gielens, Rolando M. Gonzales Martinez, Andrea Gradassi, Rosember Guerra-Urzola, Mario Guerra-Urzola, Stéphane Guerrier, Enamul Hassan, Vincent A. Haverhoek, Andrew T. Hendrickson, Amber Howard, Yuxuan Jin, Sayash Kapoor, Erik-Jan van Kesteren, Iris ten Klooster, Marie Labussiere, Lydia T. Liu, Tiffany Liu, Adam Maghout, Simone Meneghello, Lasse Mohr, Clara H. Mulder, Saul J. Newman, Jessica Nisén, Janis Norden, Mikkel Odgaard, Riccardo Omenti, Ozancan Ozdemir, Christina Pao, Paige Park, Gaia Penta, Juan C. Perdomo, Tanzir Pial, Alessio Piraccini, Federica Querin, Ziwei Rao, Christian Rellama, Adrien Remund, Frederieke Richert, Arnout van de Rijt, Mojtaba Rostami Kandroodi, Stijn J. Rotman, Lucas Sage, Germans Savcisens, Katrin Schwanitz, Steven Skiena, Alessandro Spata, Yannick Stadtfeld, Benedikt Stroebl, Gaetano Tedesco, Mathilde Theelen, Gianluca Tori, Abigail Tun-Mendicuti, Rishabh Tyagi, Keyon Vafa, Luiz Felipe Vecchietti, Linda Vecgaile, Willem R. J. Vermeulen, Maria-Pia Victoria Feser, Lionel A. Voirol, Thom B. Volker, Xinran Wang, Jiani Yan, Xinyi Zhao, Flora Zhou, Zuzana Zilincikova, Malvina Nissim, Matthew J. Salganik, Gert Stulp

arXiv 2609.01194首次发表:更新:

AI 中文总结

该研究以荷兰居民生育预测为对象,借助含147名研究者的数据挑战,发现高级模型未优于经典模型,估算出生育预测上限,揭示生殖偶然性对个体人生预测的显著限制。

AI 中文摘要

重大人生事件已被证明难以预测,这反映的是理论、数据和算法的局限,还是偶然性的重要作用?我们针对一个结果——三年内生育子女,利用近乎理想的预测场景(一项数据挑战:147名研究人员使用调查数据和全人口登记数据预测荷兰18-45岁居民的生育情况)展开研究。所用方法涵盖从逻辑回归到大语言模型和Transformer。预测准确率中等(最佳F1值:登记数据为0.59,调查数据为0.76);高级模型并未优于经典模型;规模更大的登记数据也未胜过调查数据。通过模拟受孕与妊娠的随机生物学过程,我们估算出预测上限(调查数据的F1值约为0.86-0.94,登记数据为0.88-0.96)。观测到的性能低于该上限,这表明存在数据不完善、方法不足及未建模的偶然性,而上限本身说明仅生殖过程中的偶然性就对个体人生预测设定了显著限制。

英文摘要

Major life events have proven difficult to predict. Does this reflect limits of theory, data, and algorithms, or the large role of chance? We examine one outcome - having a child within three years - through a near-ideal setting for prediction: a data challenge where 147 researchers predicted births for Dutch residents aged 18-45, using survey data and full-population registers. Methods ranged from logistic regression to a large language model and transformers. Predictions were moderately accurate (best F1: register 0.59, survey 0.76); advanced models did not outperform classical ones; and the larger registers did not beat the survey. Simulating the stochastic biology of conception and pregnancy, we estimated a predictive ceiling (survey F1 ~ 0.86-0.94, register 0.88-0.96). Observed performance falls short of this ceiling, implicating imperfect data, methods, and unmodelled chance, while the ceiling itself shows that chance in reproduction alone sets a non-trivial limit on predicting individual lives.

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑