结构-行为融合与传统系统理论的局限
Structure-Behavior Coalescence and the Limits of Traditional Systems Theory
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文针对传统系统理论中结构与行为可分离的基础假设问题，提出结构-行为融合（SBC）原则，将二者视为系统过程的相互构成方面，为理解系统同一性等提供了统一视角。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
本文探讨了传统系统理论中的一个基础假设，即结构（组件的组织方式）与行为（系统活动随时间的演变）可作为可分离的分析维度。文章指出，这种分离导致在解释系统同一性时持续存在困难，尤其涉及变化、涌现和边界界定的情况。为解决该问题，本文引入结构-行为融合（Structure-Behavior Coalescence，SBC）作为重构原则，提出结构与行为不应被理解为独立存在、后续通过建模构造关联的实体，而是单一系统过程的相互构成方面。从该视角看，系统同一性源于结构组织与行为动态的持续共同决定，而非其外部对应或对齐。这种重构在控制论导向的系统视角下，为理解系统同一性、涌现和边界形成提供了统一方式。
英文摘要
This paper examines a foundational assumption in traditional systems theory, namely that structure (the organization of components) and behavior (the evolution of system activity over time) can be treated as separable analytical dimensions. It argues that this separation contributes to persistent difficulties in explaining system identity, particularly in cases involving change, emergence, and boundary specification. To address this issue, the paper introduces Structure-Behavior Coalescence (SBC) as a reframing principle. SBC proposes that structure and behavior should not be understood as independently existing entities that are subsequently related through modeling constructs, but as mutually constitutive aspects of a single systemic process. From this perspective, system identity is understood as arising from the sustained co-determination of structural organization and behavioral dynamics, rather than from their external correspondence or alignment. This reframing provides a unified way of understanding system identity, emergence, and boundary formation within a cybernetically informed systems perspective.
