发表机构
Radiant Institute for Manifold Studies（流形研究辐射研究所）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本文提出策略质心路由机制，在智能系统行动前识别涉及的规则体系，生成审查议程，通过研究验证相关假设，明确其适用场景与弃权条件。
AI 中文摘要
在智能系统决定某一行动是否被允许前，它必须先知晓该行动涉及哪些规则。单个拟议行动可能同时涉及多个策略体系，这些体系的要求可能叠加、重叠或相互限定。然而，许多策略仍以自然语言书写，而行动本身则是意图的不完整描述。首要问题并非判断，而是注意力。策略质心路由在裁决前创建了一层机制：它将每个策略体系内的表达压缩为一个或多个代表性质心，将拟议行动置于相同语义空间，应用声明的度量标准，将所有超过阈值的策略体系路由至权威审查。多个体系可能同时触发，输出的是审查议程，而非许可、禁止、合法性、违约、合规、认证或执行。本文提出6个可证伪命题和7项后续研究，将该假设与结构化工作流、词汇及语义检索、分层与直接分类、以及匹配审查负担下的选择性预测进行对比，研究旨在识别策略几何在何处恢复适用体系、在何处压缩会丢失罕见或重叠义务、以及该机制应在何处弃权（不执行）。本文包含一个合成示例，未报告实证效能结果。
英文摘要
Before an intelligent system can decide whether an action is allowed, it must first know which rules the action has approached. A single proposed action can implicate several policy regimes at once. Their requirements may stack, overlap, or qualify one another, yet many remain written in natural language while the action itself arrives as an incomplete description of intent. The first problem is not judgment. It is attention. Policy-centroid routing creates a layer before adjudication. It compresses expressions within each policy regime into one or more representative centroids, places the proposed action in the same semantic space, applies a declared measure, and routes every regime crossing a declared threshold to authoritative review. Several regimes may trigger at once. The output is a review agenda, not permission, prohibition, legality, breach, compliance, certification, or enforcement. The paper develops six falsifiable propositions and seven follow-on studies comparing the hypothesis with structured workflows, lexical and semantic retrieval, hierarchical and direct classification, and selective prediction under matched review burden. The studies are designed to identify where policy geometry recovers applicable regimes, where compression loses rare or overlapping obligations, and where the mechanism should abstain. The paper includes a synthetic worked example and reports no empirical efficacy result.
CommentsTheory and research-program paper; 9 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables. Includes a synthetic worked example; reports no empirical efficacy result
