发表机构
Institute for Biocomputation and Physics of Complex Systems, University of Zaragoza; Department of Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zaragoza（萨拉戈萨大学复杂系统生物计算与物理研究所; 萨拉戈萨大学理学院理论物理系）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
该文从编辑视角指出同行评审压力已具象化，其核心问题是评审劳动分配不均、认可度低，且受适配小体系的出版架构组织，而非仅因潜在评审人不足。
AI 中文摘要
从编辑的角度看，同行评审的压力已不再是抽象问题，具体表现为获取合适评审报告所需邀请数量不断增加、反复依赖少数可靠同事、稿件在期刊间流转时工作重复。问题不仅在于潜在评审人过少，更在于评审劳动分配不均、认可度低，且由适配较小体系的出版架构所组织。
英文摘要
From the editor's desk, the pressure on peer review is no longer an abstract concern. It appears in the growing number of invitations needed to secure an appropriate report, the repeated reliance on a small group of dependable colleagues, and the duplication of work when manuscripts move between journals. The problem is not simply that science has too few potential reviewers. It is that reviewing labor is unevenly distributed, weakly recognized, and organized through a publication architecture built for a smaller system.
CommentsEditorial. To appear in the Journal of Complex Networks. 4 pages
