arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2608.29503cs.LGcs.DS

带预览的对抗在线分类

Adversarial Online Classification with a Preview

  • School of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Tel Aviv University(特拉维夫大学电气与计算机工程学院)
  • School of Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology(佐治亚理工学院计算机学院)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

Roi Livni, Sahil Singla

AI总结:

该研究提出带预览的对抗在线分类模型,刻画了预览率p对二元及多类别分类最优超额损失的影响,提出ChainedPrediction算法以实现精确二元界,用随机预览替代最坏情况序列复杂度。

AI中文摘要:

最坏情况在线分类由序列复杂度(如Littlestone维)决定,即使是VC维为1的阈值这类统计上简单的类别也可能无法实现。我们研究一种预览模型:无知 adversary 固定长度为T的完整标记序列,在预测开始前揭示大小为pT的均匀随机子集,剩余(1-p)T个样本则以原始对抗顺序呈现。针对在未揭示样本上评估的最佳全序列假设,我们刻画了对预览率p的依赖:对于VC维为d的二元类别,最优超额损失为Θ(d/p + √(dT)),上限为T;对于多类别类别,我们得到对应的O~(d_DS/p + √(d_Nat T))界,且不依赖标签数量。因此,随机预览可在不随机化在线顺序的情况下,将最坏情况序列复杂度替换为经典统计维度。为实现该精确二元界,我们的ChainedPrediction算法使用了链式的在线类比,实现为多尺度聚合算法而非仅作为分析论证。

英文摘要:

Worst-case online classification is governed by sequential complexity, such as Littlestone dimension, and can be impossible even for statistically simple classes, such as thresholds of VC dimension one. We study a preview model in which an oblivious adversary fixes an entire labeled sequence of length $T$, a uniformly random subset of size $pT$ is revealed before prediction begins, and the remaining $(1-p)T$ examples are then presented in their original adversarial order. Against the best full-sequence hypothesis evaluated on the unrevealed examples, we characterize the dependence on the preview rate $p$: for binary classes of VC dimension $d$, the optimal excess loss is $Θ(d/p+\sqrt{dT})$, up to the trivial cap at $T$; for multiclass classes we obtain the corresponding $\widetilde O(d_{\rm DS}/p+\sqrt{d_{\rm Nat}T})$ bound with no dependence on the number of labels. Thus a random preview can replace worst-case sequential complexity by classical statistical dimensions without randomizing the online order. To achieve the sharp binary bound, our ChainedPrediction algorithm uses an online analogue of chaining, implemented as a multiscale aggregation algorithm rather than only as an analytic argument.

↑