用人工智能测量戏剧治疗中的“互动差距”
Measuring the "Interaction Gap" in Drama Therapy with AI
查看机构详情
- Seoul National University（首尔大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文提出将戏剧治疗中患者与AI伙伴和人类伙伴完成同一任务时的自我表现差异——互动差距，作为诊断视角，探索其反映的社会压力，并提出相关测量设计与研讨问题。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
生成式AI正越来越多地被引入表达性艺术治疗领域，人们通常认为它能提供一种非评判性的环境，支持心理安全感。现有的人机交互（HCI）研究大多将AI定位为共同创作材料，或作为通往人类主导型护理的桥梁/中介。本文探索了一种不同的定位：当患者分别与AI伙伴和人类伙伴完成相同的戏剧治疗任务时，其呈现的自我往往会出现有规律的差异。我们提议将这种差异，即“互动差距”，作为戏剧治疗中的诊断视角。该视角不探究哪种情境能引出更真实的自我，而是将两次表现之间的差异解读为关于每种情境中塑造自我表达的社会压力的信息。我们基于戏剧治疗中对角色和审美距离的现有应用，勾勒了任务设计和测量信号的初步框架，并提出了研讨讨论的启发性问题：测量所带来的观察者效应与隐私悖论，以及该差距应属于谁的视角这一问题。
英文摘要
Generative AI is increasingly being introduced into expressive arts therapy, where it is often credited with offering a non-judgmental environment that supports psychological safety. Existing HCI work has largely positioned AI as a co-creative material or as a bridge/mediator into human-led care. This paper explores a different position. When a patient performs the same drama therapy task with an AI partner and with a human partner, the resulting self-presentations tend to differ in patterned ways. We propose treating this difference, the Interaction Gap, as a diagnostic lens within drama therapy. Rather than asking which context elicits a truer self, the lens reads the difference between the two performances as information about the social pressures shaping self-expression in each context. We sketch a starting point for task design and measurement signals grounded in drama therapy's existing use of role and aesthetic distance, and raise provocations for workshop discussion: the observer effect and privacy paradox that measurement introduces, and the question of whose lens the gap is.
