中国日益缩小的本土偏见与不断提升的颠覆性影响：来自全球引用网络分析的证据
China's Shrinking Home Bias and Rising Disruptive Impact: Evidence from a Global Citation Network Analysis
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究通过Web of Science的4500万篇出版物引用网络分析，发现中国本土引用偏见下降、国际化提升，且论文的范式转变能力正逐步向美国靠拢，挑战了相关主流叙事。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
中国已成为全球最大的科学出版物生产国，但仍有人担忧这种增长是由过度的国内引用实践所夸大。本研究分析了来自Web of Science（1980-2025年）的超过4500万篇出版物的引用网络，以探究中国的本土引用偏见和研究影响力。使用网络重排空模型控制出版物数量的结构效应后，我们发现中国的本土引用偏见比普遍认为的要弱，且在过去二十年中稳步下降。中国研究人员并未表现出比其他主要国家显著更强的本土引用偏好，这表明其国际化程度在提升而非趋于孤立。此外，通过持续颠覆性框架分析，我们发现中国论文在产生范式转变性成果的能力上正逐步向美国论文靠拢。这些发现挑战了关于中国科学本土偏见的主流叙事，并表明中国在研究影响力方面取得了进步。
英文摘要
China has become the world's largest producer of scientific publications, yet concerns persist that this growth is inflated by excessive domestic citation practices. In this study, we analyze a citation network of over 45 million publications from Web of Science (1980-2025) to investigate China's home citation bias and research impact. Using a network reshuffling null model to control for the structural effect of publication volume, we find that China's home citation bias is less pronounced than commonly assumed and has been steadily declining over the past two decades. Chinese researchers do not exhibit a significantly stronger home citation preference than other major countries, indicating increasing internationalization rather than insularity. Furthermore, using the persistent disruption framework, we show that Chinese papers are converging toward American papers in their capacity to produce paradigm-shifting work. These findings challenge prevailing narratives about Chinese scientific home bias and suggest that China's advances in research impact.
发表机构
- Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院）
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences（中国科学院大学）
- Shandong Normal University（山东师范大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
