韩语谓词语法中受词汇条件制约的实现歧义
Lexically conditioned realization ambiguity in Korean predicate morphology
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文针对韩语谓词语法,发现规范词素序列和语法类别标签无法唯一确定表层形式,提出需结合词汇身份、实现类别及语义信息解释实现歧义,揭示了纯粹语法表征的局限性。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
本文研究韩语的表层实现,将其与语法分析区分开来,探究规范词素序列和语法类别标签是否能唯一确定对应的表层形式。对于一类受限但具有理论启示性的韩语谓词,答案是否定的。在这些情形中,形式相同或近乎相同的词干-词尾组合会根据词汇身份和实现类别的不同而产生不同的输出。我们将该现象分析为带有屈折差异的同形异义现象,重点关注规则对与ㄷ不规则对、规则对与ㅂ不规则对以及르不规则对和러不规则对。这些案例表明,仅词干形状和词尾并不总能决定表层实现,相反,词汇意义、次范畴化和语义角色结构有助于识别目标谓词;谓词决定实现类别;实现类别决定表层形式。韩语的实现因此揭示了纯粹语法表征的局限性。
英文摘要
This paper examines Korean surface realization as distinct from morphological analysis. It asks whether a sequence of canonical morphemes and grammatical category labels uniquely determines the corresponding surface form. The answer is negative for a restricted but theoretically revealing class of Korean predicates. In these cases, formally identical or near-identical stem-ending configurations yield different outputs depending on lexical identity and realization class membership. We analyze this phenomenon as homonymy with inflectional divergence, focusing on regular versus digeut irregular pairs, regular versus bieup irregular pairs, and reu irregular versus reo irregular pairs. These cases show that stem shape and ending alone do not always determine surface realization. Instead, lexical meaning, subcategorization, and semantic role structure help identify the intended predicate; the predicate determines the realization class; and the realization class determines the surface form. Korean realization thus reveals a limit of bare morphological representation.
发表机构
- Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology(韩国科学技术院)
机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。