AI 中文总结
本研究提出分层架构，论证量子互连可解耦量子平台物理实现与网络功能，为战略性量子网络构建提供基础，解决当前量子网络缺乏效用驱动的问题。
AI 中文摘要
实现大规模量子网络不仅需要量子中继器、量子存储器和量子处理器的技术进步，还需要一个框架来解释异构量子技术如何从孤立部署发展为互连基础设施。经典互联网是在资源共享和通信需求相关的强大效用激励下演变的，而当前量子网络缺乏能产生类似激励的主导应用。因此，当代量子网络主要由技术可行性、实验验证和预期未来价值驱动的技术决策形成。本研究认为，缺乏效用驱动的网络构建不仅是应用不成熟的结果，也是抽象不足的结果。特别是，异构量子平台与其提供的功能紧密耦合，阻碍了与技术无关的效用函数的定义。本研究提出了一个由物理平台（PP）、功能（F）、服务（S）、应用（A）和用例（UC）组成的分层架构，同时论证了量子互连是实现物理实现与网络功能解耦所需的使能技术。这种解耦允许在功能层面定义效用函数，并为基于智能体的战略性网络构建的应用创造了条件。因此，量子互连不仅应被视为互操作性设备，还应被视为战略性量子网络演变的基本使能技术。
英文摘要
The realization of large-scale quantum networks requires more than advances in quantum repeaters, memories, and processors, it requires a framework explaining how heterogeneous quantum technologies evolve from isolated deployments into interconnected infrastructures. While the classical Internet evolved under strong utility incentives associated with resource sharing and communication demands, quantum networking currently lacks dominant applications capable of generating comparable incentives. As a consequence, contemporary quantum networks are largely formed through technology-driven decisions motivated by technical feasibility, experimental validation, and expected future value. This work argues that the absence of utility-driven network formation is not solely a consequence of immature applications, but also of insufficient abstraction. In particular, heterogeneous quantum platforms remain tightly coupled to the functionalities they provide, preventing the definition of technology-independent utility functions. A hierarchical architecture consisting of Physical Platforms (PP), Functionalities (F), Services (S), Applications (A), and Use-Cases (UC) is proposed, together with the argument that quantum interconnects constitute the enabling technology required to decouple physical implementations from network functionalities. Such decoupling permits the definition of utility functions at the functionality level and establishes the conditions under which strategic (agent-based) network formation becomes applicable. Quantum interconnects should therefore be viewed not only as interoperability devices, but also as fundamental enablers of strategic quantum network evolution.
Comments6 pages, 3 figures, 3 tables
