arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

AI驱动CFD的神经网络与降阶建模工作流:快速响应面、降阶动力学及横流喷流示例

Neural-Network and Reduced-order Modeling Workflows for AI-Driven CFD: Fast Response Surfaces, Reduced Dynamics and Jet in Cross-flow Examples

Kaku E. Eduku, Pavel P. Popov, Gustaaf Jacobs

arXiv 2608.26064首次发表:更新:

AI 中文总结

该研究针对高分辨率CFD模拟成本过高的问题,提出AI驱动的CFD工作流,采用MLP与POD-SINDy分别处理标量响应与降阶动力学,通过横流喷流示例验证了方法的有效性与适用场景。

AI 中文摘要

高分辨率计算流体动力学(CFD)模拟对设计至关重要,但对于密集设计空间采样而言成本过高。本章提出一种AI驱动的CFD工作流,结合标量响应建模与降阶动力学,以横流喷流为示例。首先采用反应型氢气横流喷流研究训练多层感知器(MLP),实现喷射器间距到未燃氢通量、壁面传热及整体温度浓度的映射,以保形插值为基线。CFD样本显示间距响应呈非单调特性,MLP识别出8倍喷管直径附近的中宽有利区域。留一法样本验证显示结果对预测量存在强依赖性:整体温度浓度预测稳健,而传热与未燃氢通量预测难度显著更高。随后采用稀疏非线性动力学识别(SINDy)作为场导出雷诺应力统计量的降阶建模框架。参数化SINDy模型可在模拟及样本外间距下提供紧凑的场级预测,不过因部分工况性能下降,其间距平均雷诺应力误差比POD基重构高6.7%。更广泛的结论是,AI驱动CFD并非单一模型方案:MLP对快速标量响应有效,而POD-SINDy更适用于瞬态降阶动力学及场导出统计量为核心的问题。

英文摘要

Highly resolved computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for design but too expensive for dense design-space sampling. This chapter presents an AI-driven CFD workflow that combines scalar-response modeling and reduced-order dynamics using jet-in-cross-flow examples. A reacting hydrogen jet-in-cross-flow study is first used to train a multilayer perceptron (MLP) mapping injector spacing to unburnt hydrogen throughput, wall heat transfer, and bulk temperature concentration, with shape-preserving interpolation as a baseline. The CFD samples show a non-monotonic spacing response, and the MLP identifies an intermediate-to-wide favorable region near eight jet diameters. Leave-one-sample-out validation shows strong dependence on the predicted quantity: the bulk temperature concentration is robust, while heat transfer and unburnt hydrogen throughput are substantially harder to predict. Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) is then used as a reduced-order modeling framework for field-derived Reynolds-stress statistics. The parametric SINDy model provides compact field-level predictions at simulated and out-of-sample spacings, though its aggregate spacing-mean Reynolds-stress error is $6.7\%$ higher than the POD-basis reconstruction because of degradation at selected cases. The broader conclusion is that AI-driven CFD is not a single-model prescription: MLPs are effective for fast scalar responses, while POD--SINDy is better suited when transient reduced dynamics and field-derived statistics are central to the question.

Comments18 pages, 4 figures. Book chapter manuscript. Companion Python/JAX software available at https://github.com/KjayJunIOR/parametric-sindy-jax-gridsearch

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑