福祉调色板：一款专为低负担职场福祉反思设计的动作词选择工具
The Well-Being Palette: An Action-Word Selection Tool Designed for Low-Burden Reflection on Workplace Well-Being
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究开发了Well-Being Palette工具，通过为期三个月的实地研究验证其可用于职场福祉低负担反思，发现其可提升PERMA分数，且分享工作坊有助于维持相关效果。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
背景：职场福祉干预措施需要可重复使用且对日常工作干扰极小的形式。我们开发了Well-Being Palette，这是一款基于网页的动作词选择工具，旨在用于简短、低负担的职场福祉反思。方法：在日本一家私营企业的研究机构开展的为期三个月的探索性实地研究中，88名参与者（经分析后）在每天反思积极行动或经历后，最多选择三个与福祉相关的动作词。我们检查了应用程序使用情况、PERMA Profiler分数、不同部门的选词模式、采用香农熵计算的选词多样性，以及与分享工作坊的探索性关联。结果：在正式干预期间，该应用程序收集到3480条输入记录和10104个选定词汇，且所有72个可用动作词均被选中。总体PERMA分数从基线到干预后有所提升，且在有可用数据的1个月随访中未出现明显下降。应用日志显示不同部门在选词类别上存在差异。累计选词多样性随时间增加，且分享工作坊与更持久的PERMA模式、更广泛的累计选词多样性存在探索性关联。结论：Well-Being Palette适用于在真实职场中重复使用，并提供了关于员工如何识别和标注福祉相关经历的补充日志信息。由于本研究未设置随机对照条件，也未直接测量感知负担或完成时间，研究结果应被视为探索性的，用于生成假设。
英文摘要
Background: Workplace well-being interventions need formats that can be used repeatedly with minimal disruption to daily work. We developed the Well-Being Palette, a web-based action-word selection tool designed for brief, low-burden reflection on workplace well-being. Methods: In a three-month exploratory field study at a private-sector corporate research institute in Japan, 88 analyzed participants selected up to three well-being-related action words after reflecting on positive actions or experiences from each workday. We examined application usage, PERMA Profiler scores, selected-word patterns across departments, selected-word diversity using Shannon entropy, and exploratory associations with sharing workshops. Results: During the formal intervention period, the application captured 3,480 input records and 10,104 selected words, and all 72 available action words were selected. Overall PERMA scores increased from baseline to post-intervention, and no clear decline was observed at the one-month follow-up among available cases. Application logs revealed departmental differences in selected-word categories. Cumulative selected-word diversity increased over time, and sharing workshops showed exploratory associations with more sustained PERMA patterns and broader cumulative selected-word diversity. Conclusion: The Well-Being Palette was feasible for repeated use in a real workplace and provided complementary log-based information on how workers recognized and labeled well-being-related experiences. The findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating, because the study did not include a randomized control condition and did not directly measure perceived burden or completion time.
