量化毕业设计项目中团队 dysfunction 与绩效之间的关系
Quantifying the Relationship Between Team Dysfunctions and Performance in Capstone Projects
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究基于Lencioni团队五大dysfunction模型量化毕业设计项目中团队动态与绩效的关联，发现二者呈弱到中等程度相关，为毕业设计项目设计提供了相关见解。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
本文研究了工程毕业设计项目背景下团队 dysfunction 与绩效之间的关联。毕业设计项目被认为是评估工程与计算机科学学生专业实践准备度的核心环节，不仅考察技术知识，还评估团队协作、沟通、设计与组织等核心能力。尽管团队动态在这类场景中的重要性已得到认可，但其与项目绩效的关系仍未被充分理解。利用从学生团队收集的调查数据，我们基于 Lencioni 的团队五大 dysfunction 模型对团队动态进行量化，所有指标均采用反向编码，使更高的数值代表更积极的团队行为（即更低的 dysfunction）。结果表明，团队动态与绩效之间存在弱到中等程度的关联。每个 dysfunction 得分由对应三个调查项的总和计算得出，所有项均编码为更高数值代表更积极的团队行为（即更低的 dysfunction），因此每个得分范围为3至9，更高数值反映更健康的团队动态。本研究分析了基于项目的学习环境中团队有效性的实证证据，为毕业设计项目的设计提供了见解，尤其强调了目标一致性与可交付成果聚焦的重要性，同时指出团队动态应与技术及情境因素一并考量。
英文摘要
This paper investigates the association between team dysfunctions and performance in the context of an engineering Capstone program. Capstone programs are considered fundamental in assessing the readiness of engineering and computer science students for professional practice, evaluating not only technical knowledge but also essential competencies such as teamwork, communication, design, and organization. Despite the recognized importance of team dynamics in such settings, their relationship with project performance remains insufficiently understood. Using survey data collected from student teams, we quantify team dynamics based on Lencioni's model of the five dysfunctions of a team, with all measures reverse-coded so that higher values indicate more positive team behaviors (i.e., lower dysfunction). The results indicate a weak-to-moderate relationship between team dynamics and performance. Each dysfunction score was computed as the sum of three corresponding survey items. All items were coded such that higher values indicate more positive team behaviors (i.e., lower dysfunction). Therefore, each score ranges from 3 to 9, where higher values reflect healthier team dynamics. This study analyzes empirical evidence on team effectiveness in project-based learning environments and offers insights for the design of Capstone programs. In particular, it highlights the importance of goal alignment and focus on deliverables while emphasizing that team dynamics should be considered alongside technical and contextual factors.
