arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

格点立方体的无和子集的数量

The number of sum-free subsets of lattice cubes

Haoran Luo

arXiv 2608.23544首次发表:更新:

AI 中文总结

本文研究d维格点立方体$[n]^d$的无和子集数量,证明固定$d\geq3$时其数量为$2^{M([n]^d)+O_d(n^{d-1})}$,验证了Elsholtz与Rackham的猜想,所用方法结合了多种数学工具且避开了容器引理等。

AI 中文摘要

d维格点立方体$[n]^d$的一个子集是无和的,若它不包含方程$x+y=z$的解。我们研究这类子集的总数。对于$d=1$,Cameron和Erdős猜想$[n]$的无和子集数量为$O(2^{n/2})$,该结论被Green与Sapozhenko独立证明;Ghosal近期的工作解决了$d=2$的情形。本文中,我们考虑所有剩余维度,证明对每个固定整数$d\geq3$,$[n]^d$的无和子集数量为$2^{M([n]^d)+O_d(n^{d-1})}$,其中$M([n]^d)$是$[n]^d$的无和子集的最大可能规模,这验证了Elsholtz和Rackham的一个猜想。我们的证明结合了Keevash与Lim在其关于$M([n]^d)$的工作中构造的对偶权重、Ghosal给出的一维计数估计、Zhao的二分交换引理以及Madiman和Tetali的强分数熵不等式,且避免使用容器引理或先推导稳定性定理。

英文摘要

A subset of the $d$-dimensional lattice cube $[n]^d$ is sum-free if it contains no solution to the equation $x+y=z$. We study the total number of such subsets. For $d=1$, Cameron and Erdős conjectured that the number of sum-free subsets of $[n]$ is $O(2^{n/2})$, and this was proved independently by Green and Sapozhenko. A recent work by Ghosal solved the case $d = 2$. In this paper, we consider all remaining dimensions and prove that for every fixed integer $d \geqslant 3$, the number of sum-free subsets of $[n]^d$ is $2^{M([n]^d) + O_d(n^{d-1})}$, where $M([n]^d)$ is the maximum possible size of a sum-free subset of $[n]^d$. This verifies a conjecture of Elsholtz and Rackham. Our proof combines the dual weights constructed by Keevash and Lim in their work for $M([n]^d)$, a one-dimensional counting estimate due to Ghosal, a bipartite swapping lemma of Zhao, and a strong fractional entropy inequality of Madiman and Tetali, and it avoids the use of the container lemma or deriving a stability theorem first.

Comments26 + 10 pages. 3 figures. Comments are welcome

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑