arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2608.19773math.CO

色多项式与列表着色函数相等性的非持久性

Non-persistence of equality between chromatic polynomials and list-color functions

Meiqiao Zhang, Fengming Dong

AI总结:

本文否定了“若图G的色多项式与列表着色函数在k处相等且为正,则在k+1处也相等”的问题,对每个k≥3构造了无限族反例,并将结论推广到任意此类图的衍生图上。

AI中文摘要:

对于任意图G,令P(G,k)和P_ℓ(G,k)分别表示G的色多项式和列表着色函数。一个未解决的问题是:对任意图G和整数k,若等式P(G,k)=P_ℓ(G,k)>0成立,是否必有P(G,k+1)=P_ℓ(G,k+1)也成立?本文否定了该问题的答案。对每个整数k≥3,我们构造了无限族图G,满足P(G,k)=P_ℓ(G,k)>0,但P(G,k+1)>P_ℓ(G,k+1)。此外,以该无限族图为附着装置,我们进一步证明:任何满足P(H,k)=P_ℓ(H,k)>0的图H,都可衍生出无限族图H',使得P(H',k)=P_ℓ(H',k)>0且P(H',k+1)>P_ℓ(H',k+1)。

英文摘要:

For any graph $G$, let $P(G,k)$ and $P_{\ell}(G,k)$ denote the chromatic polynomial and the list-color function of $G$, respectively. It remains an open problem whether, for every graph $G$ and integer $k$, the equality $P(G,k)=P_{\ell}(G,k)>0$ implies that $P(G,k+1)=P_{\ell}(G,k+1)$ also holds. In this paper, we answer this question in the negative. For every integer $k\ge 3$, we construct an infinite family of graphs $G$ such that $P(G,k)=P_{\ell}(G,k)>0$ while $P(G,k+1)>P_{\ell}(G,k+1)$. Moreover, using this infinite family of graphs as attachment gadgets, we further show that any graph $H$ with $P(H,k)=P_{\ell}(H,k)>0$ can be developed into an infinite family of graphs $H'$ with $P(H',k)=P_{\ell}(H',k)>0$ and $P(H',k+1)>P_{\ell}(H',k+1)$.

↑