Social.Wiki：一个共有的网络
Social.Wiki: A Web Held in Common
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
Social.Wiki是支持公众协作创建交互式社交网站的去中心化系统，采用多元治理与细粒度安全模型，结合Graffiti基础设施，经案例研究和实际部署验证其可行性。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
人们依赖的许多网站都有所有者，其利益与用户的利益并不完全一致。我们通过提出一种对网络的重新构想来解决这个问题的根源，在这种网络中，网站根本不被拥有，而是像维基百科的文章一样由协作产生。我们将这个系统称为Social.Wiki，因为它支持交互式社交网站的共同创建，例如用于微博、消息传递、约会、游戏、拼车等的网站。借助现成的AI工具，几乎没有或没有编程经验的人可以编辑这些网站，以更好地反映其社区的需求和偏好。Social.Wiki基于Webstrates等协作式可塑软件系统的理念构建，但专为公众参与而设计，而非仅在小型受信任组内使用。为此，Social.Wiki包含治理机制以缓解冲突。为了适应多样化的治理偏好，我们的“多元治理”模型允许人们独立选择决定他们看到的网站编辑的政策。它还在可塑环境中实现了细粒度安全模型，以保护个人数据。作为Social.Wiki网站的去中心化设计和治理的补充，网站编辑和站内数据都存储在去中心化基础设施Graffiti上，将底层服务器的所有权与网站的所有权解耦。我们通过案例研究评估Social.Wiki，展示它支持的社会技术结构范围，以及通过在黑客马拉松和真实场景中的部署来评估。
英文摘要
Many of the websites people depend on have owners whose interests are not fully aligned with their users. We address the root of this problem by presenting a reimagining of the web where sites are not owned at all but are instead collaboratively produced like Wikipedia articles. We call the system Social$.$Wiki because it supports the co-creation of interactive social sites, such as those for microblogging, messaging, dating, gaming, ride sharing, and so on. With off-the-shelf AI tools, people with little or no programming experience can edit these sites to better reflect the needs and preferences of their communities. Social$.$Wiki builds on ideas from collaborative malleable software systems such as Webstrates, but is designed for public participation rather than use only within small, trusted groups. To this end, Social$.$Wiki includes governance to mitigate conflict. To accommodate diverse governance preferences, our model of "plural governance" lets people independently choose the policies that determine which edits to a site they see. Social$.$Wiki also implements a granular security model to protect personal data in a malleable environment. Complementing the decentralized design and governance of Social$.$Wiki sites, both site edits and within-site data are stored on Graffiti, a decentralized infrastructure, decoupling the ownership of underlying servers from the ownership of sites. We evaluate Social$.$Wiki through case studies that demonstrate the range of sociotechnical structures it supports, as well as through deployments at a hackathon and in the wild.
