arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

GRIP:基于信息受限前提的接地推理

GRIP: Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises

Lirui Teng

arXiv 2608.16776首次发表:更新:

发表机构

University of Waterloo(滑铁卢大学)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

AI 中文总结

针对RAG中查询主导导致证据失效的问题,提出GRIP方法,通过容量不对称设计优化信息编码,在五个推理基准上实现性能提升,大幅降低互信息与幻觉。

AI 中文摘要

检索增强生成(RAG)中的大容量编码器会让查询主导潜在状态,导致检索到的证据在功能上无关紧要,我们将这种失效模式称为查询主导。为解决该问题,我们提出GRIP(Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises,基于信息受限前提的接地推理),该方法引入容量不对称性:解码器可全维度访问查询,而检索到的证据需经过严重的随机瓶颈,这迫使证据通道仅编码查询无法提供的残差信息。在五个推理基准上,GRIP优于强大的迭代基线,将查询-潜在互信息诊断值降低约30倍(从14.8比特降至0.47比特),并减少73%的幻觉。残差对齐分析进一步表明,瓶颈输出占据的子空间与查询的对齐度低于基线表示。

英文摘要

High-capacity encoders in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can let the query dominate the latent state, leaving retrieved evidence functionally irrelevant. We call this failure mode query dominance. To address it, we introduce \textbf{GRIP} (Grounded Reasoning via Information-Restricted Premises), which imposes capacity asymmetry: the decoder keeps full-dimensional access to the query, while retrieved evidence passes through a severe stochastic bottleneck. This forces the evidence channel to encode only the residual information unavailable from the query. Across five reasoning benchmarks, GRIP outperforms strong iterative baselines, cuts a query--latent mutual-information diagnostic by roughly 30$\times$ (14.8 $\to$ 0.47 bits), and reduces hallucination by 73\%. Residual-alignment analysis further shows that the bottleneck output occupies subspaces less aligned with the query than baseline representations.

Comments15 pages, 3 figures

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑