AI 中文总结
本文在探测器域偏移下对DANTE进行压力测试，再分析LIGO O4a数据，得出其失效模式与有效性条件，撤回v5相关天体物理解释，未发现可靠的致密双星信号富集。
AI 中文摘要
本版是Domain-Adaptive Network for Transient Evaluation（DANTE）预印本的第六版，在表示不匹配和观测运行适应条件下对无监督瞬态噪声流水线进行压力测试。我们使用冻结的DINOv2 patch嵌入和Top-k多实例评分，重新分析了来自42个LIGO O4a时段的10429个探测器时间应变候选体。候选体和本底Q变换共享Q∈[4,64]，并通过时间块自举从5000个运行本征窗口校准探测器特定阈值。该一致性分析得出6365个ROBUST（可靠）、1275个AMBIGUOUS（模糊）和2789个BACKGROUND（本底）统计处置；在10372个配对历史处置中，有4676个与跨表示的v5分析结果不同。直接对照分析显示，在本征适应后，H1的O3b-O4a评分发生偏移且降低，但L1未出现该情况，而已知 glitch（噪声）的分离取决于探测器和形态。重复研究量化了种群对本底抽取、聚类种子、字典大小和白化的敏感性，证明了本征索引吸收，并识别出条件低Q盲区。保守的H1-L1最大偏移筛查得出8806个值中有13个超过阈值，但它的源上值和合并的每事件零最大值不可交换。主要的双零PEM端点未显示出已解决的ROBUST-BACKGROUND富集（p=1.000），且两个目录重叠与圆形偏移覆盖代理一致（p=0.651）。仅模拟的致密双星对照显示，新颖性、本征处置和物理符合之间存在探测器和距离依赖的不一致。我们撤回了v5的发现、速率限制、目录召回和全巡天稳定性解释。支持的结果是测得的无监督探测器表征的失效模式和有效性条件集合，而非新的噪声类或天体物理搜索。
英文摘要
This sixth version of the Domain-Adaptive Network for Transient Evaluation (DANTE) preprint stress-tests an unsupervised transient-noise pipeline under representation mismatch and observing-run adaptation. We reanalyse 10,429 detector-time strain candidates from 42 LIGO O4a sessions using frozen DINOv2 patch embeddings and a Top-k multiple-instance score. Candidate and native-background Q-transforms share Q in [4,64], and detector-specific thresholds are calibrated from 5,000 run-native windows by temporal-block bootstrap. The coherent analysis yields 6,365 ROBUST, 1,275 AMBIGUOUS, and 2,789 BACKGROUND statistical dispositions; 4,676 of 10,372 paired historical dispositions differ from the cross-representation v5 analysis. Direct controls resolve an O3b-O4a score shift and reduction after native adaptation for H1, but not L1, while known-glitch separation is detector- and morphology-dependent. Replicated studies quantify population-dependent sensitivity to background draw, clustering seed, dictionary size, and whitening, demonstrate native-index absorption, and identify conditional low-Q blindness. A conservative H1-L1 max-shift screen yields 13/8,806 values above threshold, but its on-source values and pooled per-event null maxima are not exchangeable. The primary two-null PEM endpoint shows no resolved ROBUST-BACKGROUND enrichment (p=1.000), and two catalogue overlaps are consistent with a circular-shift coverage proxy (p=0.651). Simulation-only compact-binary controls show detector- and distance-dependent disagreement between novelty, native disposition, and physical coincidence. We withdraw the v5 discovery, rate-limit, catalogue-recall, and survey-wide stability interpretations. The supported result is a measured set of failure modes and validity conditions for unsupervised detector characterization, not a new glitch class or an astrophysical search.
Comments12 pages, 10 figures, 1 table. Sixth version: representation-coherent O4a reanalysis, detector-aware catalogue reconstruction, replicated robustness and failure-mode validation, physical and catalogue null controls, and withdrawal of unsupported v5 discovery, rate-limit, catalogue-recall, and survey-wide stability interpretations
