AI 中文总结
本研究与11名残障人士共同设计社交VR中的反残障歧视骚扰保护机制，基于近体学理论划分空间区域，提出多类保护探针，揭示残障人士的社会价值需求并给出兼顾安全与社会形象的设计建议。
AI 中文摘要
残障人士（PWD）越来越多地使用虚拟形象在社交虚拟现实（VR）中表达残障身份，但更高的可见度也会招致针对性骚扰。现有的安全功能往往不足，忽略了残障人士的体验与需求。为解决这一差距，我们与11名残障人士共同设计了保护机制，以揭示他们的价值观与需求。本研究采用社会视角解读骚扰行为与保护机制，受霍尔的近体学理论（该理论指出人际距离反映社会意图与边界）启发，我们将社交VR空间划分为四个近体区：亲密区、个人区、社交区与公共区，并以此构建保护机制的共同设计。我们还提供了不同的保护机制探针：告知、教育、同意与对抗，以引出参与者的偏好。本研究强调社会邻近性在塑造残障人士的骚扰感知与保护偏好中的作用，揭示了残障人士独特的社会价值观与需求，例如以乐观与韧性应对骚扰、将社会形象置于安全之上。我们提出了保护机制的设计建议，在保护残障人士的同时维护他们期望的社会形象。
英文摘要
People with disabilities (PWD) increasingly use avatars to express disability identities in social virtual reality (VR), but greater visibility also invites targeted harassment. Existing safety features are often insufficient, overlooking PWD's experiences and needs. To address this gap, we co-designed protection mechanisms with 11 PWD to reveal their values and needs. Our research employed a social lens to interpret harassment behaviors and protection mechanisms. Inspired by Hall's Proxemics Theory that interpersonal distances indicate social intent and boundaries, we divided social VR spaces into four proxemic zones (Intimate, Personal, Social, and Public) and used them to structure our protection mechanism co-design. We also provided different protection mechanism probes (Inform, Educate, Consent, and Combat) to elicit participant preferences. Our study highlighted the role of social proximity in shaping PWD's harassment perception and protection preferences and revealing PWD's unique social values and needs (e.g., managing harassment with optimism and resilience, prioritizing social image over safety). We proposed design recommendations for protection mechanisms that protect PWD while maintaining their desired social images.
