arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2608.13400math.RThep-thmath-phmath.MPmath.QA

朗兰兹对偶与不变微分算子:SL(2n+1)的情形

Langlands Duality and Invariant Differential Operators: the Case SL(2n+1)

V. K. Dobrev

AI总结:

本文在朗兰兹对偶与不变微分算子间搭建桥梁,基于哈里什-钱德拉的半单李群表示理论,针对SL(2n+1)的情形展开研究,此前已研究SL(2n)的情形,两类群的表示理论存在差异。

AI中文摘要:

近期,我们开始在朗兰兹对偶的两种情形之间搭建桥梁。朗兰兹对偶是数学研究中最具影响力的课题之一,具有多种不同的表现形式和有影响力的子课题。然而,至今似乎有一个与朗兰兹纲领无关的课题,即不变微分算子。这一情况颇为奇怪,因为这两个课题都深深植根于哈里什-钱德拉的半单李群表示理论。我们已从群SL(2n)的情形入手开展研究,本文则处理群SL(2n+1)的情形;上述两个群虽具有相似性,但它们的表示理论却存在显著差异。

英文摘要:

Recently we started building a bridge between two cases of Langlands duality. The latter is one of the most influential topics in mathematical research. It has many different appearances and influential subtopics. Yet there is a topic that until now seems unrelated to the Langlands program. That is the topic of invariant differential operators. That is strange since both items are deeply rooted in Harish-Chandra's representation theory of semisimple Lie groups. We started with the case of the group ~$SL(2n)$. In the present paper we deal with the group $SL(2n+1)$. The two mentioned groups are similar, but their representation theories is rather different.

补充信息

↑