含分布式逆变型资源主导电力系统的安全约束运行：预防与校正决策下的静态及动态安全
Security-Constrained Operation of IBR-Dominated Power Systems: Static and Dynamic Security Across Preventive and Corrective Decisions
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
针对IBR主导电力系统的安全约束运行，提出涵盖静态/动态安全、预防/校正决策的二维框架，综述相关研究并发现IBR能力可优化运行，为后续研究指明方向。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
逆变型资源（IBR）将电力系统运行与快速动态过程及控制器依赖响应耦合，其可配置能力正在重塑安全约束运行的公式化表述与协调机制。本文提出二维视角：静态安全与动态安全、预防决策与校正决策的时间维度。预防调度正从静态事故后可行性向动态安全延伸，而校正运行涵盖基于平衡点的校正动作与基于轨迹的控制。通用公式化表述体现了这一变化，并明确了预防与校正间的权衡关系。本文在该框架内对现有公式、方法及能力表述进行了综述与整合，得出两项关键发现：其一，IBR的能力可扩大可行域或缓解安全约束，从而降低运行成本或提升安全性能；其二，不同公式间共享的能力与约束决定了该能力是否可在运行中实现。这些发现为后续研究提供了方向，包括IBR能力的表征与量化、联合调度及可扩展求解框架。
英文摘要
Inverter-based resources (IBRs) couple power system operation to fast dynamics and controller-dependent responses. Their configurable capabilities are reshaping the formulation and coordination of security-constrained operation. This paper presents a two-axis view: static versus dynamic security and preventive versus corrective decision timing. Preventive scheduling is extending from static post-contingency feasibility toward dynamic security, while corrective operation spans equilibrium-based corrective actions and trajectory-based control. A generic formulation represents this change and makes the preventive--corrective tradeoff explicit. Existing formulations, methods, and capability representations are reviewed and synthesized within this framework. The surveyed work yields two findings. First, IBR capability can expand the feasible set or relieve security constraints, reducing operating cost or improving security performance. Second, shared capability and constraints across formulations determine whether that capability remains operationally deliverable. These findings motivate future research in IBR capability characterization and quantification, joint scheduling, and scalable solution frameworks.
