当我们谈论信息图表时，我们指的是什么？
What Do We Mean When We Talk About Infographics?
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究针对可视化领域信息图表的概念模糊问题，通过文献编码与从业者调查识别出其概念分歧维度，并提出未来研究方向。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
在可视化研究与实践中，“信息图表（infographics）”或“信息图形（information graphics）”这一术语的定义始终缺乏清晰性与一致性，尤其缺乏对人们对信息图表的概念化认知存在哪些共识或分歧的理解。为填补这一空白，我们开展了系统文献综述与从业者调查，以识别并对比关于信息图表的不同视角。我们对111篇可视化与人机交互（HCI）论文中的487个句子进行了归纳编码，并分析了44名领域从业者的问卷反馈。研究结果揭示了信息图表概念分歧的反复出现的维度：文本的作用、与数据可视化的关系、与统计图表及数据漫画（data comics）的关系。基于上述结果，我们建议未来研究需明确报告在这些分歧概念化过程中所做的任何假设，探究这些分歧的认知起源，并开发更全面的信息图表设计组件框架。补充材料可通过开放科学框架（OSF）及交互式网页应用获取。
英文摘要
There has been limited clarity and consistency regarding what the term infographics, or information graphics, refers to in visualization research and practice. In particular, little is understood about where people's conceptualizations of infographics converge or diverge. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic literature review and a practitioner survey to identify and contrast different perspectives on infographics. We performed inductive coding on 487 sentences from 111 visualization and HCI papers, and analyzed questionnaire responses from 44 domain practitioners. Our findings reveal recurring dimensions of conceptual disagreement on infographics: role of text, relationship with data visualization, and relationships with statistical charts and data comics. Based on the results, we recommend future work to explicitly report any assumptions made along these diverging conceptualizations, to investigate the cognitive origins of these disagreements, and to develop more holistic design component frameworks for infographics. The supplementary materials are available via OSF and as an interactive web application.
