通过科学关键词表征和平
Characterizing Peace Through Scientific Keywords
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本研究通过分析不同背景下SDG 16相关学术出版物的关键词差异，揭示和平概念在学科和国别间的不同表征，为研究重点和科学政策制定提供依据。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
本研究旨在表明，科学研究中反映的和平并非中性或统一的概念，而是在不同学科和地缘政治背景下以不同方式构建的。为此，本研究分析了不同学科、社会和国家背景下，与SDG 16（可持续发展目标16，促进和平、正义与强大机构）相关的学术出版物在关键词使用上的差异，并确定哪些关键词与社会和平水平较高和较低的国家关联最为紧密。结果显示，与和平相关的研究虽以暴力为核心，但却通过不同视角解读：生物医学和NSE（自然科学与工程）领域采用技术和法医方法，社会科学领域则采用制度、法律和社会视角。在国家层面，暴力仍是核心锚点，但其框架随和平水平而变化：和平水平较高的国家将暴力嵌入福利、健康和社会体系，和平水平较低的国家则强调冲突、安全和地缘政治。这些结果有助于制定研究重点和科学政策举措。
英文摘要
This study aims to show that peace, as reflected in scientific research, is not a neutral or uniform concept but is constructed differently across disciplines and geopolitical contexts. To do this, this study analyzes differences in the use of keywords among scholarly publications aligned with SDG 16 across various disciplinary, societal, and national contexts, and identifies which keywords are most strongly associated with countries exhibiting higher versus lower levels of societal peace. Results show that while peace-related research is strongly centered on violence, it is interpreted through distinct lenses: technological and forensic approaches in biomedical and NSE fields, and institutional, legal, and societal perspectives in the social sciences. At the country level, violence remains a central anchor, but its framing varies with levels of peace, with higher-peace countries embedding it within welfare, health, and social systems, and lower-peace countries emphasizing conflict, security, and geopolitics. These results could contribute to shaping both research priorities and science policy initiatives.
