当创作变得容易时我们可能失去什么：创意工作中生成式AI带来的摩擦、判断与批判性反思实践
What We Risk Losing When Creating Gets Easy: Friction, Judgment, and Critical Reflective Practice with Generative AI in Creative Work
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文探讨GenAI让创作变易时可能失去的创意核心，主张创作摩擦是构建判断的关键，呼吁开展批判性反思实践，并提出相关开放性问题供研究者等探索。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
生成式人工智能（GenAI）在创意实践中可帮助缩小创作意图与产出之间的差距，但同时也会改变创意过程本身的本质。在这篇立场文件中，我们提出创作过程中的摩擦并非需要消除的额外负担，而是创意工作的核心：是构建与完善判断的阻力来源。我们既拒绝完全排斥GenAI，也反对不加批判地采用它，呼吁开展批判性反思实践：即有意识地、持续地且因地制宜地权衡在创意工作中何时使用或拒绝GenAI，将判断的形成视为设计与教学应（继续）秉持的认知美德。文中从我们的专业与个人经历中提炼出GenAI怀疑论者与GenAI狂热者两种声音，二者相互辩论并与我们展开对话。最后，我们为在创意实践中GenAI应用的灰色地带探索的研究者、教育者与从业者提出开放性问题。
英文摘要
GenAI in creative practice can help narrow the gap between intention and output, but in so doing changes the very nature of that creative process. In this position paper, we argue that the friction of making is not overhead to be removed, but essential to creative work: the resistance through which judgment is built and refined. Rejecting both outright refusal and uncritical adoption, we call for critical reflective practice: the deliberate, ongoing, and situated weighing of when to use or refuse GenAI in creative work, treating the formation of judgment as an epistemic virtue that design and pedagogy should (continue to) uphold. Two voices, the GenAI Skeptic and GenAI Enthusiast, drawn from our professional and personal experiences, argue with each other and with us throughout. We close with open questions for researchers, educators, and practitioners navigating the grey areas of GenAI in creative practice.
