发表机构
Imperial College London; The University of Queensland; Cardiff University; King’s College London（伦敦帝国学院; 昆士兰大学; 卡迪夫大学; 伦敦国王学院）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
该研究提出以计算论辩为基础，为具备可解释性和可争议性的评估型人工智能（EAI）提供正式可计算基础，推动构建分布式、以人类为中心的EAI系统。
AI 中文摘要
评估型人工智能（EAI）近期被提出，用于支持人类决策，其方式并非生成单一建议，而是呈现相互竞争的假设以及支持与反对各假设的证据。在这篇立场文件中，我们主张（计算）论辩是一种特别合适的范式，可为具备可解释性和可争议性的EAI形式提供正式、可计算的基础，为构建分布式、以人类为中心的EAI系统这一长期研究议程奠定基础。
英文摘要
Evaluative AI (EAI) has been recently proposed as a way to support human decision-making, not by producing a single recommendation, but by presenting competing hypotheses together with evidence for and against each. In this position paper, we advocate (computational) argumentation as a particularly suitable paradigm to provide a formal, computable foundation for forms of EAI that are explainable and contestable, setting the ground for a long-term research agenda towards distributed and human-centred EAI systems.
