AI 中文总结
ASIDE是实现双人旁观者反思（DSR）的系统，通过像素艺术戏剧化重演与分歧卡，帮助情侣跳出角色、共同检视过往文本冲突的解读差异，提供了可复用的双人反思交互结构。
AI 中文摘要
当人们就文本内容发生争论时，双方虽共享对话记录，但对含义的解读可能存在差异。现有的AI反思工具通常仅基于一方的表述开展工作，而双人工具虽支持共同表达，却无法让解读差异被检视。我们提出ASIDE，这是一个用于双人旁观者反思（Dyadic Spectator Reflection，DSR）的系统。DSR遵循先独立外化、再共同相遇的流程：从过往的聊天冲突中，ASIDE创建带有可修改AI生成内在状态假设的像素艺术戏剧化重演。双方首先确认关于自身的假设，并分别编辑对另一方的解读；待双方完成后，共同查看经共同标注的场景，并查看分歧卡（Divergence Cards）——分歧卡将已确认的表述与对话特定节点中另一方的解读配对呈现。在一项针对10对情侣的探索性研究中，他们重新审视了真实的文本冲突，参与者表示戏剧化重演帮助他们跳出自身角色，共同观察冲突。我们贡献DSR作为可复用的双人反思交互结构，以及关于双方如何利用它从共同观察者视角重新审视过往文本冲突的探索性说明。
英文摘要
When two people argue over text, each knows what they meant and can only guess what the other was thinking. Existing AI reflection tools work from one person's account, and dyadic tools support co-expression without making the gap between accounts inspectable. We propose Dyadic Spectator Reflection (DSR), an interaction structure in which both partners externalize their models of each other independently and then encounter them together, and present ASIDE, a system that operationalizes it. ASIDE replays a past text conflict as a pixel-art theatrical scene where each character's unspoken state appears as an AI-inferred thought bubble either partner can contest and rewrite. Each edits alone, and the two versions meet only when both are done, in a scene they watch together. In an exploratory study, 10 couples revisited real conflicts and described the scene as a shared position from which to observe their own argument, stepping out of their roles without disengaging from it, and Divergence Cards as a way to locate specific interpretation gaps afterward. We contribute DSR as a reusable interaction structure, ASIDE as its system realization, and exploratory empirical findings on how couples used it.
CommentsAccepted at the 39th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST 2026)
