arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2608.05417cs.GT

Hare和Droop配额下的多项式时间完全正当代表权

Full Justified Representation under Hare and Droop Quotas in Polynomial Time

Yizhou Ai

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

该研究针对认可多赢家选举,提出降预算算法,分别在Hare和Droop配额下多项式时间内得到满足对应完全正当代表权的委员会,算法确定性且复杂度为O(kmn)。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

我研究了基于认可的多赢家选举中,在Hare配额和Droop配额两种规则下的完全正当代表权(FJR)。我提出了一种降预算算法,其中选民将剩余预算分配到当前代表缺口,当产生的报价覆盖共同价格时就购买候选人。当候选人价格为λ_H=n/k时,该算法返回满足Hare-FJR的委员会;当候选人价格为λ_D=n/(k+1)时,返回满足Casey和Elkind提出的要求更严格的Droop-FJR公理的委员会。两种保证共享历史支付不变性和终端行列核算论证,而Droop的证明需要在所有k个付费席位填满时使用新的剩余预算论证。一旦选民和候选人的顺序固定,两种变体都是确定性的,使用O(kmn)次有理运算。

英文摘要

I study Full Justified Representation (FJR) in approval-based multiwinner elections under both the Hare and Droop quota conventions. I introduce a descending-budget algorithm in which voters distribute their remaining budgets across their current representation gaps and candidates are purchased whenever the resulting offers cover a common price. With candidate price $λ_H=n/k$, the algorithm returns a Hare-FJR committee; with candidate price $λ_D=n/(k+1)$, it returns a committee satisfying the more demanding Droop-FJR axiom of Casey and Elkind. The two guarantees share a historical-payment invariant and a terminal row--column accounting argument, while the Droop proof requires a new residual-budget argument when all $k$ paid seats are filled. Both variants are deterministic once the voter and candidate orders are fixed and use $O(kmn)$ rational operations.

补充信息

↑