AI 中文总结
针对大型语言模型可完成AI入门课程作业的问题，华盛顿大学博塞尔分校重新设计CSS 382课程，保留经典核心、新增大模型构建模块，重构评估体系，还通过学生参与制定教师AI使用规范。
AI 中文摘要
大型语言模型可以完成人工智能入门课程的大部分作业。本文是一份关于华盛顿大学博塞尔分校CSS 382课程重新设计的经验报告，旨在应对这一情况。课程重新设计并未冻结课程体系，而是保留了课程的经典核心内容（搜索、对抗搜索、马尔可夫决策过程、强化学习），并增加了一个模块，要求学生从头构建一个大型语言模型，使学生必须使用的工具同时也是必须理解的工具。评估体系围绕抵制无来源自动化的任务重建：课堂练习、反思性写作和需答辩的团队项目，完全取消了考试。关于人工智能的政策从2023年未提及的状态转变为2026年要求使用的状态。本文的核心是一个参与式伦理系列活动，一组学生共同商议并通过了一份“学生人工智能权利法案”，用于约束教师自身对人工智能的使用，其中要求教师在发布任何人工智能生成的作业前亲自完成。这些条款由人工智能生成的提示语搭建框架并经学生批准，其来源是本报告考察的内容之一。本文报告了该设计、学生创作的成果以及后续出现的矛盾，包括学生对人工智能生成课程材料的反对意见，同时明确关注单组设计叙事所能主张内容的局限性。
英文摘要
Large language models can complete most of the assignments in an introductory artificial intelligence course. This paper is an experience report on redesigning one such course, CSS~382 at the University of Washington Bothell, in response. Rather than freeze the curriculum, the redesign retained the course's classical core (search, adversarial search, Markov decision processes, reinforcement learning) and added a strand in which students build a large language model from scratch, so that a tool they are required to use is also one they are required to understand. Assessment was rebuilt around tasks that resist unattributed automation: in-class exercises, reflective writing, and a defended team project, with examinations removed entirely. The policy on AI was inverted, from unmentioned in 2023 to required in 2026. The center of the paper is a participatory ethics sequence in which a cohort of students deliberated on and endorsed a "Student Bill of AI Rights" governing their instructor's own use of AI, including a requirement that the instructor personally complete any AI-generated assignment before issuing it. The provisions were scaffolded by an AI-generated prompt and ratified by the students, and that provenance is part of what the account examines. The design, the student-authored artifacts, and the tensions that followed are reported, including student objections to AI-generated course materials, with explicit attention to the limits of what a single-cohort design narrative can claim.
Comments7 pages
