arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2608.03185cs.CV

CRIL-U-Net:用于从T1w和FLAIR MRI中分割局灶性皮质发育不良的紧凑比率交互学习网络

CRIL-U-Net: Compact Ratio-Interaction Learning for Focal Cortical Dysplasia Segmentation from T1w and FLAIR MRI

Soumen Ghosh, Amit Soni Arya, Tilottama Goswami, Subhojit Mandal, John Phamnguyen, Rajat Vashistha

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

该研究针对II型局灶性皮质发育不良MRI自动分割难题,提出CRIL-U-Net模型,在85例患者与25例对照的五折交叉验证中,其性能显著优于传统及注意力型U-Net。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

II型局灶性皮质发育不良(FCD)是耐药性局灶性癫痫的重要结构性病因,但其体积小、外观异质性强且MRI特征微妙,使得自动分割极具挑战性。传统多模态网络通常将T1加权(T1w)图像与液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)图像进行拼接,要求后续层隐式学习有用的跨模态关系。我们提出CRIL-U-Net,一种3D U-Net,其集成了紧凑比率交互学习模块,该模块结合了局部空间特征、体素级跨模态混合以及受双向比率启发的交互作用。我们在85例FCD患者和25例健康对照者上采用五折交叉验证,将CRIL-U-Net与传统3D U-Net及输入自注意力U-Net进行对比。每种架构均使用Dice-二元交叉熵(Dice-BCE)和焦点Tversky-焦点(FTF)损失进行独立训练。在使用FTF损失时,CRIL-U-Net的平均Dice分数为0.196±0.262,达到最高水平,而U-Net的分数为0.136±0.224,注意力对比模型的分数为0.135±0.214。它在85例病例中的44例产生了非零病变重叠,而U-Net为36例。在FTF损失下,经错误发现率校正后,CRIL-U-Net显著优于两种对比架构。这些发现表明,在结合不平衡感知目标的受控U-Net设置中,紧凑跨模态表示学习可改善FCD分割,尽管剩余48.2%的零重叠率凸显了进一步验证和方法学开发的必要性。

英文摘要

Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) type II is an important structural cause of drug-resistant focal epilepsy, but its small size, heterogeneous appearance, and subtle MRI characteristics make automated segmentation challenging. Conventional multimodal networks commonly concatenate T1-weighted (T1w) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, requiring subsequent layers to learn useful cross-modal relationships implicitly. We propose CRIL-U-Net, a 3D U-Net incorporating a Compact Ratio-Interaction Learning module that combines local spatial features, voxel-wise cross-modal mixing, and bidirectional ratio-inspired interactions. CRIL-U-Net was compared with a conventional 3D U-Net and an input self-attention U-Net using five-fold cross-validation on 85 FCD subjects and 25 healthy controls. Each architecture was trained independently using Dice-binary cross-entropy (Dice-BCE) and Focal Tversky-Focal (FTF) losses. With FTF, CRIL-U-Net achieved the highest mean Dice score (0.196 +/- 0.262), compared with 0.136 +/- 0.224 for the U-Net and 0.135 +/- 0.214 for the attention comparator. It produced nonzero lesion overlap in 44 of 85 cases, compared with 36 for the U-Net. Under FTF, CRIL-U-Net significantly outperformed both comparison architectures after false-discovery-rate correction. These findings suggest that compact cross-modal representation learning can improve FCD segmentation within a controlled U-Net setting when combined with an imbalance-aware objective, although the remaining zero-overlap rate of 48.2% highlights the need for further validation and methodological development.

↑