arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2608.02762cs.CV

哦,鹿啊,我该如何应对?用于选择性野生动物标注与分类的季节先验

Oh Deer, How Should I Handle This? Seasonal Priors for Selective Wildlife Annotation and Classification

发表机构奥尔堡大学 · 上奥地利应用科学大学 · 麻省理工学院
查看机构详情
  • Aalborg University(奥尔堡大学)
  • University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria(上奥地利应用科学大学)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology(麻省理工学院)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

Hugo Markoff, Christoph Praschl, Anton Hjalte Jørgensen, Christian Emil Mogensen, Mathias Bech Skadhauge, Sara Beery, Michael Ørsted, David C. Schedl

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

该研究针对航拍野生动物分类的标签不可靠问题,以马鹿雄性识别为对象,利用季节先验结合多模态数据提升标注与分类效果,提出的方法可指导标注协议设计和模态加权。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

航拍图像中的细粒度野生动物分类不仅受限于模型性能,还受限于不可靠的标签:动物仅占据少量像素,关键视觉线索随季节变化,且特定模态的证据可能存在歧义。我们研究了马鹿的成年雄性识别,其中鹿茸周期定义了标注和预测的可靠证据的可预测窗口。使用由三名标注者标注的7295组仅RGB、仅热成像以及匹配的RGB+热成像裁剪数据集,我们表明季节结构将(I)标注质量、(II)下游分类和(III)选择性预测关联起来。匹配的RGB+热成像审查比任一单一模态能解决更多样本,恢复了原本仅RGB或仅热成像会遗漏的多数雄性标签,无论是基于人类还是基于模型的分类均如此。标注者弃权(不执行)率高的月份,分类器置信度也更低,而软季节先验主要有益于受季节限制的热成像视图。不确定性带弃权(不执行)进一步将覆盖准确率提升至98.9%,尽管覆盖范围有所减少,且推迟判断的情况不成比例地落在雄性身上。总体而言,基于生物学的季节日历可预测标注和预测不可靠的场景,能指导标注协议设计和模态加权。

英文摘要

Fine-grained wildlife classification in aerial imagery is limited not only by model performance, but also by unreliable labels: animals occupy few pixels, key visual cues vary seasonally, and modality-specific evidence can be ambiguous. We study adult-male identification in red deer ($\textit{Cervus elaphus}$), where the antler cycle defines predictable windows of reliable evidence for both annotation and prediction. Using 7,295 RGB-only, thermal-only, and matched RGB+thermal crop sets from low-altitude UAV surveys, labeled by three annotators, we show that seasonal structure links (I) annotation quality, (II) downstream classification, and (III) selective prediction. Matched RGB+thermal review resolves more samples than either single modality, recovering majority-male labels otherwise missed by RGB or thermal alone, in human-based as well as model-based classification. Months with high annotator abstention also show lower classifier confidence, and soft seasonal priors mainly benefit the season-limited thermal view. Uncertainty-band abstention further raises covered accuracy to 98.9%, though at reduced coverage and with deferral that falls disproportionately on males. Overall, a biologically grounded seasonal calendar predicts where annotation and prediction are unreliable, and can guide both annotation protocol design and modality weighting.

补充信息

↑