本地灵活性市场的基准案例研究：网络、场景与开放输入
A Benchmarking Case Study for Local Flexibility Markets: Network, Scenarios, and Open Inputs
AI总结：
本文围绕修改后的CIGRE中压网络构建了一套与方法无关的完整输入集，公开相关数据，为本地灵活性市场的基准测试提供了可公平比较的统一输入基础。
AI中文摘要：
本地灵活性市场的外部输入、网络模型、需求场景、灵活性报价以及资产的热力、经济参数均不改变出清方法，但这些输入通常在不同假设下定义，阻碍了可复现的基准测试。本文提供了一套完整的、与方法无关的输入集，基于修改后的CIGRE中压（MV）网络构建，包含规定的基准负载和应力负载条件、合成灵活性报价、批发价格以及变压器和电缆参数。针对两天的情况，报告了基准交流运行点（电压、负载率和老化），以便将替代灵活性请求和出清方法应用于相同输入并进行公平比较。相关数据在Zenodo上公开提供。
英文摘要：
External inputs to local flexibility markets, network models, demand scenarios, flexibility offers, and asset thermal, economic parameters do not change the clearing methodology, yet they are routinely defined under heterogeneous assumptions, which hinders reproducible benchmarking. This paper provides a complete, methodology-agnostic input set built around a modified CIGRE MV network with prescribed base-load and stress-load conditions, synthetic flexibility offers, wholesale prices, and transformer and cable parameters. Baseline AC operating points (voltages, loadings, and aging) are reported for both days so that alternative flexibility-request and clearing methods can be applied to the same inputs and compared fairly. The associated data are released openly on Zenodo.
