AI 中文总结
本文针对文学文本色彩术语语料库分析工具匮乏的问题，构建含俄语224条、英语141条的多维色彩词典，经试点研究发现别雷诗歌语料库色彩术语出现频率为狄金森语料库的3.4倍，提供了透明可复用的多语言色彩词典构建应用流程。
AI 中文摘要
本文针对文学文本色彩术语的语料库辅助语言分析研究工具相对匮乏的问题展开研究。文章介绍了两部多维色彩词典的开发：一部俄语词典含224个词条，一部英语词典含141个词条。词典构建过程包括从专业资源和研究文献中获取色彩词汇，对比两种语言的词汇表，人工核查候选译词，以及处理语言特有的形态特征。除识别色彩术语和视觉描述词外，词典还按色相、饱和度和温度对词条进行分类。为展示其实际应用，对针对性选取的安德烈·别雷诗歌语料库（20373个 tokens）和艾米莉·狄金森诗歌语料库（28479个 tokens）开展了试点研究。所有检索到的匹配项均经语境核查，并被分类为Confirmed_chromatic（已确认色彩类）、Ambiguous_visual（歧义视觉类）或Excluded（排除类）。分析分为两个主要阶段：仅包含已确认色彩词汇的严格分析，以及同时纳入已确认和歧义色彩词汇的敏感性分析，以判定临界案例的编码决策是否影响主要发现。定量结果显示，色彩术语、视觉描述词、色相、饱和度和温度的使用存在显著差异。具体而言，分析表明已确认色彩术语在别雷语料库中的出现频率是狄金森语料库的3.4倍。这些发现证明了多维方法的分析价值，本研究的主要贡献是一套透明且可复用的多语言色彩词典构建与应用流程。
英文摘要
This article addresses the relative scarcity of research tools for the corpus-assisted linguistic analysis of colour terms in literary texts. It describes the development of two multidimensional chromatic lexicons: one for Russian (224 entries) and one for English (141 entries). Lexicon construction involved sourcing colour vocabulary from specialised resources and research literature, comparing the two language inventories, manually checking translated candidates, and addressing language-specific morphological features. In addition to identifying colour terms and visual descriptors, the lexicons classify entries according to hue, saturation, and temperature. To demonstrate their practical application, a pilot study was conducted on purposively sampled corpora of poetry by Andrei Bely (20,373 tokens) and Emily Dickinson (28,479 tokens). All retrieved matches were checked in context and classified as Confirmed_chromatic, Ambiguous_visual, or Excluded. The analysis was implemented in two main stages: a strict analysis including confirmed chromatic lexis only, followed by a sensitivity analysis incorporating both confirmed and ambiguous chromatic lexis to determine whether coding decisions about borderline cases affected the main findings. The quantitative results indicated marked differences in the use of colour terms, visual descriptors, hue, saturation, and temperature. Specifically, the analysis revealed that confirmed chromatic terms occurred 3.4 times more frequently in the sampled Bely corpus than in the Dickinson corpus. These findings demonstrate the analytical value of a multidimensional approach, with the main contribution of this study being a transparent and reusable procedure for constructing and applying multilingual chromatic lexicons.
Comments14 pages, 3 tables
