arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

匹配经典界限的在线影子断层成像

Online Shadow Tomography Matching the Classical Bounds

Sitan Chen, Ryan O'Donnell, Angelos Pelecanos, John Wright

arXiv 2607.29686首次发表:更新:

AI 中文总结

本研究针对在线影子断层成像问题,提出匹配经典最优率的算法,改进了相关参数界限,关键在于基于量子Efron–Stein分解的测量后损伤量化框架。

AI 中文摘要

在线影子断层成像中,我们获得未知d维量子态ρ的副本,对手(自适应地)提出一系列有界可观测量A⁽¹⁾,…,A⁽ᵐ⁾,在给出每个A⁽ᵗ⁾后,我们必须估计Tr(A⁽ᵗ⁾ρ),误差在±ε范围内。这是经典自适应数据分析问题的直接量子推广,离线情况(A⁽¹⁾,…,A⁽ᵐ⁾预先给出)也是研究充分的问题,核心目标是最小化所需副本数n。在线影子断层成像的先前结果在m、d、ε三个参数上均非最优,落后于已知的经典最优率。本研究最终缩小了这一差距,给出一对匹配经典率的算法:左侧界限首次实现o(log²m)依赖与poly(log(d)/ε)结合,甚至在离线影子断层成像设置中也改进了所有三个指数;右侧界限在与d无关的界限中被证明最优,比先前最佳结果提升了√m log m倍。证明的关键是基于量子Efron–Stein分解的新框架,用于量化测量后损伤。

英文摘要

In Online Shadow Tomography, we are given copies of an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum state $ρ$, an adversary (adaptively) proposes a sequence of bounded observables $A^{(1)},\ldots,A^{(m)}$, and after each $A^{(t)}$ is given we must estimate $\mathrm{Tr}(A^{(t)}ρ)$ to within $\pm ε$. This is the direct quantum generalization of the classical problem of Adaptive Data Analysis. Prior results for online Shadow Tomography were suboptimal in all three parameters $m, d, ε$, lagging behind the best known and classical rates, for which there is some evidence of optimality. In this work, we finally close this gap, giving a pair of algorithms matching the classical rates. Our first algorithm is the first to achieve $o(\log^2 m)$-dependence together with $\mathrm{poly}(\log(d)/ε)$; moreover, it improves all three exponents even in the Offline Shadow Tomography setting. Our second algorithm is known to be optimal among bounds independent of $d$, and improves the best prior result by a $\sqrt{m} \log m$ factor. The key to our proof is a new framework for quantifying post-measurement damage, based on the quantum Efron-Stein decomposition.

Comments26 pages. v2: Updated abstract formatting on arxiv

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑