AI 中文总结
该研究提出ALIVE控制层，解决预算多源学习中源排除的证据授权问题，实验显示其可提升准确率-AUBC，且勾勒出约束-能力-成本-效用边界。
AI 中文摘要
路由决策可在下一次事务中修改，但锁定的源排除会在后续所有决策中持续存在。我们探究当有限总体审计与学习共享预算时，何种证据应授权这些具有不同持久性的操作。ALIVE（基于证据的操作分层干预）是一种可审计的控制层：一个随机无放回前缀提供缓存证据，启发式警告驱动非锁定的下限有界路由，且仅当容量可行激活时，两次新鲜的同时证书分离才可锁定排除请求。在理想均匀审计排列下，基于固定支持和标签的条件下，任何保留此接口的可预测控制器，对违反预定义绝对或相对严格多数分歧谓词的源，都会继承一个随时可用的δ级家族错误率边界。使用已发布的已知规模全严格多数PPR引擎，e40中的中位数证据计数从304个身份降至96个，e60中从171个降至62个，而两个引擎在e80中均使用48个。在匹配的CIFAR控制器中，持久操作层在所有十个配对种子集群中比仅路由的情况增加了+0.1935的准确率-AUBC百分点；与CBR的全系统+0.1954点对比也为正，但未达到预先声明的多重调整标准（条件Holm调整符号翻转参考值=0.097656）。在固定自然面板上，探索性PPR使用95而非105的中位数闭合前缀用于探索性Serfling/FPC，但仍覆盖了面板的88.0%且无下游任务。这些结果共同勾勒出约束-能力-成本-效用边界：操作契约控制已定义的持久决策，而净价值取决于证据边际、审计成本和预算机制。
英文摘要
A routing decision can be revised at the next transaction, but a latched source exclusion persists across later decisions. We ask what evidence should authorize these unequal-persistence actions when finite-population auditing and learning share a budget. ALIVE (Action-Layered Intervention via Evidence) is an auditable control layer: one randomized without-replacement prefix supplies cached evidence, heuristic warnings drive non-latching floor-bounded routing, and only two fresh simultaneous certificate separations may latch an exclusion request subject to capacity-feasible activation. Conditional on fixed support and labels under an ideal uniform audit permutation, any predictable controller preserving this interface inherits an anytime familywise bound of δon acting against a source that fails the pre-fixed absolute or relative strict-majority-disagreement predicate. With a published known-size, all-strict-majority PPR engine, median evidence count fell from 304 to 96 identities in e40 and from 171 to 62 in e60, while both engines used 48 in e80. In the matched CIFAR controller, the persistent-action layer added +0.1935 accuracy-AUBC percentage points over routing-only in all ten paired seed clusters. The +0.1954-point full-system contrast against CBR was also positive but did not meet the predeclared multiplicity-adjusted criterion (conditional Holm-adjusted sign-flip reference value =.097656). On a fixed natural panel, exploratory PPR used a median closure prefix of 95 rather than 105 for exploratory Serfling/FPC, but still exposed 88.0% of the panel and had no downstream task. Together these results map a restraint--power--cost--utility boundary: the action contract controls a defined persistent decision, while net value depends on evidence margin, audit cost, and budget regime.
