arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2607.28434cs.AIcs.CL

隐喻追踪器:基于理论指导的隐状态分析

Metaphor Tracer: A Theory-Informed Analysis of Hidden States

Marc Heimann, Roxana Assadi Moghaddam, Olga Brovkina, Mark Pettifor, Lutz Goetzmann

首次发表
浏览论文内容

中文总结 AI 辅助

本研究提出Metaphor Tracer工具,通过聚合器与区分器分析语言模型隐状态,验证其可追踪文本结构与隐喻迁移,为隐状态提供关系论解读。

中文摘要 AI 辅助

语言模型的隐状态能揭示单篇文本的组织方式吗?无需训练,仅通过一次前向传播,我们就能对每个词元位置的两个属性进行评分:聚合器(aggregator)衡量该位置是否将整篇文本整合为稳定构型;区分器(differentiator)衡量模型阅读时,其他词元是否会短暂进入该位置的子空间,即隐喻的本义——迁移。我们在一篇发现文本上冻结了常量,其余所有实验均为验证性。聚合器并非经典意义上的信息度量或显著性度量。在三个不相关模型中,当某个能指重复出现时,其意外值(surprisal)和注意力会衰减,但聚合器评分保持稳定:该通道标记了词元在文本中的位置。这一结果基于独立的真实依据:聚合器可追踪人工设计的语域边界(6/6个单元),以及心理分析师在工具诞生前对临床文本的标注(34/36个单元),其评分在词汇对照之上呈分级递增,且存在类型级度量无法复现的解离现象。迁移测试验证了结果的形态:词元结构随词汇类型迁移的模型,对单篇论述的阅读效果最差;在匹配的基础模型/指令微调模型对中,微调提升了保真度但未改变类型迁移。结构价值是词元在当前文本中位置的属性,而非仅其向量的属性:这是对隐状态的关系论而非本质论解读,实现了早于该工具的理论。

英文摘要

What do a language model's hidden states say about the organization of a single text? From one forward pass, without training, we score every token position on two properties. The *aggregator* measures whether the position consolidates the whole text into a stable configuration. The *differentiator*, whether other tokens are transiently carried into its subspace as the model reads: metaphor in its root sense, transport. Constants were frozen on one discovery text; every other is confirmatory. The aggregator is not, in the classic sense, an information measure, nor a measure of salience. Across three unrelated models, as a signifier repeats, its surprisal and its attention drain while its aggregator score holds: the channel marks a token's place in the text. That this tracks a reading rests on independent ground truth: an engineered register the aggregator follows across its boundaries (6/6 cells), and a psychoanalyst's marking of clinical transcripts, fixed before the instrument existed, in 34/36 cells, with a graded increment above lexical controls and dissociations no type-level measure reproduces. A transfer test gives the result its shape: the model whose token structure travels with lexical type reads the singular discourse worst, and in a matched base/instruct pair tuning raises fidelity without moving type-transfer. Structural value is a property of a token's place in *this* text, not of its vector alone: a relational rather than essentialist reading of hidden states, operationalizing theory that predated the instrument.

发表机构

  • Hermeneutic AI(诠释学人工智能公司)

机构由 AI 辅助整理,请以论文原文为准。

补充信息

↑