发表机构
Univ. Lille; CNRS; Inria; Centrale Lille; UMR 9189 CRIStAL（里尔大学; 法国国家科学研究中心; 法国国家信息与自动化研究所; 中央里尔大学; UMR 9189 CRIStAL）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
本文提出设计构思中AI应作为反思支持的阻力主体，而非促进输出的顺滑主体，其核心作用是支持设计师构建和承载创意依据。
AI 中文摘要
面向创意工作的生成式AI工具通常以消除阻力为设计目标，其假设是更顺畅的迭代和更快的输出能为设计师带来更多价值。但本文认为，这种框架忽略了设计构思中一个重要方面——行动中的反思。接受、拒绝和修改候选创意的行为既是通向最终结果的路径，也是设计师构建依据的过程，该依据使设计师能借助创意思考并向他人传达创意。这在群体构思中尤为重要，因为创意需要向他人表达和解释，以便群体进一步拓展、拒绝或组合创意。本文提出，设计构思中的AI更应被视为支持反思的阻力主体，而非促进输出的顺滑主体。这种重新定位为AI在设计构思中开辟了不同角色，即支持设计师构建和承载依据，而非替代依据。
英文摘要
Generative AI tools for creative work tend to be designed around the goal of removing friction, on the assumption that smoother iteration and faster output translate into more value for the designer. We argue, however, that this framing leaves out something important about how design ideation works, namely reflection-in-action. The act of accepting, rejecting and reworking candidate ideas is both a path to a final outcome and the process through which designers develop the rationale that allows them to think with their ideas and to communicate them to others. This becomes particularly important in group ideation, where ideas need to be expressed and explained to others to allow the group to extend, reject or combine them further. We suggest that AI in design ideation might be more usefully thought of as a friction agent for reflection rather than as a smoothing agent for output. This reframing opens up a different role for AI in design ideation, one that supports designers in building and carrying rationale rather than substituting for it.
CommentsIn Proceedings of The First Reflection in Creative Experience (RiCE) Workshop (RiCE W1) arXiv:2607.24558
