发表机构
UT Austin; University of Toronto; Stanford University; MIT; USC; KAUST（德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校; 多伦多大学; 斯坦福大学; 麻省理工学院; 南加州大学; 阿卜杜拉国王科技大学）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
研究针对人机协作写作难以判断创作过程的问题，提出Humanly写作平台，用户能配置环境，平台记录活动与辅助，可打包会话生成证书，支持多种场景，经研究验证对各角色有帮助且能区分打字方式。
AI 中文摘要
教师、会议主席和普通读者都只能依据有限证据评判写作，仅看到最终文档而不知创作过程，无法判断是人工打字、AI生成还是人机混合协作。现有过程跟踪工具存在局限。Humanly是一个写作平台，以写作过程为证据。用户可配置写作环境，其工作区记录写作活动和平台内AI辅助。它能将完整会话打包成带异常行为审查的写作证书，支持多种写作场景。用户研究表明其对各角色有帮助，红队研究显示其打字检测器能区分人工与自动打字。
英文摘要
Teachers, conference chairs, and public readers all judge writing from limited evidence, seeing only a finished document and not the process that produced it. Final text alone cannot reveal whether a document was produced through human typing, AI generation, or mixed human-AI collaboration. Existing process-tracking tools help, but many are tied to host-document histories, provide coarse activity records, and offer limited control over the writing environment. Humanly is a writing platform that makes the writing process itself the evidence. Users configure writing environments for personal documents or assigned tasks and draft in a workspace that records writing activity and in-platform AI assistance. Humanly can package a completed session into a sealed writing certificate with configuration-aware anomaly behavior review. It can support writing scenarios such as course assignments, peer review, and personal certification. Our user study shows that Humanly is helpful across roles, and a red-teaming study shows that the Humanly Typing Detector distinguishes human hand typing from automated typing.
