AI 中文总结
该研究以新加坡公共住房政策为实验，调查1128户移民与本地家庭。发现租赁市场移民租户居住更远、租金更低，少数族裔更明显；转售市场入籍公民与本地人房价无差异。扩展空间同化文献，可推广到少数族裔聚居区少的城市。
AI 中文摘要
本研究从时间角度调查社会融合对移民住房行为的影响，将新加坡对移民的差异化公共住房政策作为准自然实验。在当地市镇理事会支持下，对1128户居住在公共屋邨的移民和本地家庭进行社会融合调查。在主要面向尚未融入移民的公共开放租赁住房市场，发现移民租户居住距离工作场所远3.04%，每多居住一年租金低0.67%，少数族裔影响更大。使用社会融合的替代主观或客观指标时结果依然稳健。在主要面向本地人和融入良好的入籍公民的公共转售住房市场，入籍公民与本地购房者相比无价格溢价，表明融入良好后融合对房价无进一步影响。本研究扩展了关注种族居住隔离的空间同化文献，可推广到少数族裔聚居区少的城市。
英文摘要
This study investigates the impact of social integration on immigrants' housing behaviours from a temporal perspective, using Singapore's differential public housing policies on immigrants as a quasi-natural experiment. With the support of a local town council, we conducted a survey on social integration among 1,128 immigrant and local households living in public housing estates. In the public open rental housing market - primarily accommodating yet-to-integrate immigrants - we find immigrant renters live up to 3.04% farther from their workplace and pay lower rents up to 0.67% per additional year of residency. Such impacts are more substantial among minority ethnic groups. The results remain robust when using alternative subjective or objective measures of social integration. However, in the public resale housing market - primarily accommodating native and well-integrated naturalised citizens - we find that naturalised citizens face no price premiums relative to native homebuyers, implying no further effect of integration on housing prices after well-integration. This study extends the literature of spatial assimilation focusing on ethnic residential segregations and is generalizable to cities with few ethnic enclaves.
Journal refCities, 2026
DOI：10.1016/j.cities.2026.107220
