AI 中文总结
两人就外部世界实在论存在分歧，以对抗性合作形式探讨算法唯心主义模型连贯性及解决观察者悖论能力，用学科中立模板进行合作，旨在克服学术群体碎片化，助读者看清分歧根源。
AI 中文摘要
我们中的一人是实在论者，认为现实根本上由受物理定律支配的外部物理世界构成，观察者要么是涌现的（物理主义），要么存在于物理现实之外。另一人捍卫一种唯心主义观点，认为现实根本上由未嵌入世界的第一人称状态构成，自然法则直接作用于其上，共享的“物理世界”只是涌现的。分歧最终集中在一个名为算法唯心主义的形式模型的整体连贯性及其解决观察者悖论（如玻尔兹曼大脑悖论）的能力上。我们的目标是以对抗性合作的形式面对这个问题，避免相互误解，让读者看到分歧的真正根源并自行判断。我们的工作试图建立一种交流形式，可能有助于克服哲学、物理等学术群体的碎片化。此次合作使用了在另一篇论文中开发的理论对抗性合作的学科中立模板，希望它能在其他理论学科中有用。
英文摘要
One of us is a realist and believes that reality fundamentally consists in an external physical world, governed by laws of physics. Observers are either emergent (physicalism) or exist in addition to physical reality. The other defends a version of idealism and believes that reality fundamentally consists in first-person states, unembedded into worlds, on which laws of nature act directly. Shared "physical worlds" are merely emergent. The disagreement ultimately centers on the overall coherence of a formal model, known as Algorithmic Idealism, and its ability to resolve observer paradoxes, such as the Boltzmann brain paradox. Our aim is to confront this issue in the form of an adversarial collaboration, where we avoid misunderstanding each other, so that readers can see the true source of the disagreement, and decide for themselves. Our work represents an attempt to establish a form of exchange that may help overcome the fragmentation of scholarly communities in philosophy, physics, and elsewhere. The collaboration was conducted using a discipline-neutral template for theoretical adversarial collaboration developed in a companion paper [1], which we hope will be useful in other theoretical disciplines.
Comments19 pages. Please note the companion paper "Theoretical adversarial collaboration: a template"
